Impact of locoregional irradiation in patients with upfront metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Publication date: June 2019 Source: Oral Oncology, Volume 93 Author(s): A. Rambeau, V. Bastit, S. Thureau, J. Thariat, C. Moldovan, M. Roge, E. Babin, B. Gery, F. Di Fiore, C. Florescu, F. Clatot AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the frequency of use, modalities and potential interest of locoregional irradiation (LRT) in patients with upfront metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). MethodsRetrospective multicentric study. Were included all patients presenting an upfront metastatic HNSCC treated by platin-5FU- cetuximab based regimen, from 2008 to 2016. Patients with past history of cervical irradiation or HNSCC within the 5 years before metastasis diagnosis were excluded. Results65 patients were included. 25 patients (38%) presented a response or stable disease with chemotherapy. Forty-one patients (63%) underwent a locoregional irradiation: 5 patients before chemotherapy (upfront RT), 13 patients with stable disease or response after chemotherapy (consolidation RT), and 23 patients with progressive disease. Median overall survival (OS) was 11.6 months, median progression free survival was 7.9 months. OS was significantly improved for patients who underwent LRT (median OS 16.1 vs 7.5 months, p < 0.01). Among patients who received LRT, OS trended to be better if LRT was performed as consolidation RT compared to upfront RT (median OS of 22.1 vs 15.5 months, p = 0.11). Among patients with stable disease or response after chemotherapy, there was a non-significant better OS for the 13 patients treated by LRT (median OS 22.1 vs 11.8 months, p = 0.21)). Radical dose was not associated with better locoregional control compared to palliative dose (p = 0.37). ConclusionLRT is frequently performed during management of upfront metastatic HNSCC and associated with better OS. Non-progressive disease after firs-line chemotherapy seems a good way to select patients who would benefit from radical LRT. |
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin versus cisplatin in stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis Publication date: June 2019 Source: Oral Oncology, Volume 93 Author(s): Weiting Liao, Jiaxing Huang, Qiuji Wu, Guiqi Zhu, Xinyuan Wang, Feng Wen, Pengfei Zhang, Nan Zhang, Qiu Li AbstractBackgroundNedaplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy became an alternative doublet treatment strategy to cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregional, advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Materials and methodsUsing a Markov model, we simulated patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma from disease-free to death. Input data for the model were collected from published literature and the standard fee database of West China Hospital. The outcome was expressed in quality-adjusted-years (QALYs), net monetary benefit at the threshold of $25,841, three times the Gross Domestic Product of China in 2017. The costs and benefits were discounted at 3% annually and a half-cycle correction was considered. The input parameters were varied in one-way sensitivity analysis to confirm the robustness of the model. All of the primary analyses used second-order probabilistic sensitivity analysis to capture the impact of parameter uncertainty based on 10,000 Monte-Carlo simulations. ResultsThe mean QALYs of treatment in stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma were comparable: 2.90 QALYs for nedaplatin and 3.12 QALYs for cisplatin. Nedaplatin cost $34,505 compared with $27,167 for cisplatin, generating an incremental net monetary benefit of nedaplatin versus cisplatin of $-13,357 at the ceiling ratio of $25,841. The results of nedaplatin remained cost-ineffective over the majority of the sensitivity analyses. The cost-effectiveness curve showed that the probability of strategies being cost-effective were 0% for nedaplatin and 100% for cisplatin in stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma at any willingness-to-pay threshold. ConclusionsNedaplatin is a dominated, cost-ineffective alternative to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma compared with cisplatin from the perspective of Chinese society. |
Altered-fractionation radiotherapy improves local control in early-stage glottic carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 1762 patients Publication date: June 2019 Source: Oral Oncology, Volume 93 Author(s): Lucas Gomes Sapienza, Matthew Stephen Ning, Senzo Taguchi, Vinícius Fernando Calsavara, Antônio Cássio de Assis Pellizzon, Maria José Leite Gomes, Luiz Paulo Kowalski, Glauco Baiocchi AbstractObjectivesTo perform a systematic review of 1762 patients to comprehensively assess the benefit of altered-fractionation radiotherapy (ART) in early stage glottic carcinoma (ESGC). Materials and methodsStudies were identified in PubMed and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria were: (1) diagnosis of squamous cell ESGC (Tis, T1, T2); (2) ART versus conventionally-fractionationated radiotherapy (CRT); and (3) provision of number of local recurrence events and total numbers per fractionation arm. The random-effects model was fitted to estimate the pooled hazard ratio (HR). Subgroup sensitivity analyses were performed based on ART strategy (hypo- versus hyperfractionation), treatment-day reductions, machine type, tumor stage, and anterior commissure involvement. ResultsEleven studies met inclusion criteria: 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 7 two-arm retrospective studies. ART was associated with 38% fewer (HR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.46–0.82, p = 0.0009) and 60% fewer (HR 0.40; 95% CI: 0.24–0.66, p = 0.0003) local failure events in pooled analyses of the RCTs and retrospective studies, respectively. Both hyperfractionation (HR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.43–0.97, p = 0.03) and hypofractionation (HR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.33–0.91, p = 0.02) strategies were superior to CRT. The benefit persisted for all treatment- and tumor-related parameters, including anterior commissure involvement, with the exception of a pooled analysis of studies with predominantly T2 (<50% T1) cases (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.30–1.20, p = 0.15). ConclusionBoth hypofractionation and hyperfractionation improve local control in ESGC, including T1 tumors and for anterior commissure involvement. However, this benefit may not persist for T2 tumors, for which alternative strategies should be considered. |
Clinical outcome of stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung-only oligometastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Is the deferral of systemic therapy a potential goal? Publication date: June 2019 Source: Oral Oncology, Volume 93 Author(s): Pierluigi Bonomo, Daniela Greto, Isacco Desideri, Mauro Loi, Vanessa Di Cataldo, Ester Orlandi, Nicola Alessandro Iacovelli, Carlotta Becherini, Luca Visani, Viola Salvestrini, Matteo Mariotti, Lorenzo Livi AbstractObjectivesOligometastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a rare entity with no evidence-based treatment recommendations available to support the use of local ablative therapies. The aim of our study was to report on the clinical benefit of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with lung-only oligometastases, defined by the presence of 1 to 5 pulmonary lesions. Material and MethodsSBRT was applied in case of single lesions deemed amenable to local treatment only ("de novo" pattern) or after first line chemotherapy at time of disease oligoprogression ("induced" pattern). To assess the potential deferral of systemic therapy in both time points, we analyzed time to progression (TTP) defined as the time from the last day of SBRT to disease progression or death from any cause. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors of better outcome. ResultsTwenty-seven patients were retrospectively evaluated. The majority (81.5%) had HPV negative disease and a "de novo" oligometastatic pattern (78.6%). The median maximum lesion diameter and target size were 1.5 cm and 22.7 cc, respectively. At a median follow-up of 22 months (range 6–73), the median TTP was 10 months (95% CI: 9.5–21.1), with 1- and 2-year rates of 56.2% and 35%, respectively. The objective response rate at 3 months after SBRT was 75%. At multivariate analysis baseline T3/T4 stage had a HR for worse outcome of 5.38 (p = 0.033). Acute toxicity was minimal (G1/G2 of 14.8%). ConclusionIn properly selected oligometastatic patients, SBRT has potential for sustained deferral of systemic treatment. |
Assessment of oral health-related quality of life instruments for oral submucous fibrosis: A systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist Publication date: June 2019 Source: Oral Oncology, Volume 93 Author(s): Shailesh M. Gondivkar, Rahul R. Bhowate, Amol R. Gadbail, Sachin C. Sarode, Rima S. Gondivkar AbstractQuality of life (QoL) instruments are becoming increasingly important in research and often used in clinical practice. Various QoL instruments have been developed/ validated for assessment of oral health-related QoL (OHRQoL) in patients with oral submucous fibrosis (OSF). Selection of an adequate instrument is challenging in routine practice due to lack of information on psychometric quality of measurement instruments. This systematic review gives an extensive overview of quality of all the currently available measurement instruments for use in OSF patients. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL were searched for relevant literature until December 2018 and the information was extracted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of the identified studies was assessed per measurement property according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurements Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Four studies that met the inclusion criteria were included. Three generic and one disease-specific QoL instruments were identified. Information regarding important measurement properties was often incomplete. The evidence for the quality of measurement instruments was found to be variable, none of the instruments performed sufficient on all measurement properties. Based on the available information, OHRQoL-OSF appeared to have adequate COSMIN measurement properties. As recently published, newer QoL instruments have not yet been evaluated in an adequate manner for use in OSF. We suggest future studies should implement OSF-specific OHRQoL-OSF to better understand OSF patients' perspectives and help inform clinicians to propose treatment strategies as per patients' needs. |
Tumor safety and side effects of photobiomodulation therapy used for prevention and management of cancer treatment toxicities. A systematic review Publication date: June 2019 Source: Oral Oncology, Volume 93 Author(s): Mariana de Pauli Paglioni, Anna Luíza Damaceno Araújo, Lady Paola Aristizábal Arboleda, Natalia Rangel Palmier, Jéssica Montenegro Fonsêca, Wagner Gomes-Silva, Cristhian Camilo Madrid-Troconis, Felipe Martins Silveira, Manoela Domingues Martins, Karina Morais Faria, Ana Carolina Prado Ribeiro, Thaís Bianca Brandão, Marcio Ajudarte Lopes, Adriana Franco Paes Leme, César Augusto Migliorati, Alan Roger Santos-Silva AbstractPhotobiomodulation therapy (PBMT), also known as low-level laser therapy (LLLT), has been increasingly used for the treatment of toxicities related to cancer treatment. One of the challenges for the universal acceptance of PBMT use in cancer patients is whether or not there is a potential for the light to stimulate the growth of residual malignant cells that evaded oncologic treatment, increasing the risk for tumor recurrences and development of a second primary tumor. Current science suggests promising effects of PBMT in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema and oral mucositis, among other cancer treatment toxicities. Nevertheless, this seems to be the first systematic review to analyze the safety of the use of PBMT for the management of cancer-related toxicities. Scopus, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Embase were searched electronically. A total of 27 articles met the search criteria. Selected studies included the use of PBMT for prevention and treatment of oral mucositis, lymphedema, radiodermatitis, and peripheral neuropathy. Most studies showed that no side effects were observed with the use of PBMT. The results of this systematic review, based on current literature, suggest that the use of PBMT in the prevention and management of cancer treatment toxicities does not lead to the development of tumor safety issues. |
Endoscopic-assisted maxillectomy: Operative technique and control of surgical margins Publication date: June 2019 Source: Oral Oncology, Volume 93 Author(s): Alberto Deganello, Marco Ferrari, Alberto Paderno, Mario Turri-Zanoni, Alberto Schreiber, Davide Mattavelli, Alperen Vural, Vittorio Rampinelli, Alberto Daniele Arosio, Alessandro Ioppi, Mario Cherubino, Paolo Castelnuovo, Piero Nicolai, Paolo Battaglia AbstractBackgroundWhen amenable to radical excision, cancer involving the maxilla is typically treated with maxillectomy followed by adjuvant therapy. Posterior tumor extension beyond the maxillary box leads to the invasion of complex areas, where achieving clear margins may be challenging. MethodsPatients undergoing endoscopic-assisted maxillectomy for nasoethmoidal, maxillary, or hard palate cancer between 2007 and 2017 were included in the study. Surgical technique, margin status, and recurrences were analyzed. Extension of posterior resection was classified in 3 types (type 1: resection of the pterygopalatine fossa; type 2: resection of the pterygoid plates and related muscles; type 3: resection of the upper parapharyngeal space). The analysis of putative risk factors for involvement of margins and local recurrence was performed with special focus on the posterior and medial margin. ResultsThe study included 79 patients (75 with available follow-up; mean: 20.6 months, range: 6–101 months), 37 (46.8%) of whom underwent type 1 resection, 34 (43.0%) type 2, and 8 (10.1%) type 3. According to pT category, 57 (72.2%) tumors were classified as T4a/T4b. Posterior and medial clear margins were achieved in 76/79 (96.2%) and 75/79 (94.9%) patients, respectively. T4b category, extension to the ethmoid, sphenoid sinus, pterygoid process, orbital cavity, and premaxillary tissues were significantly associated with a higher rate of margin involvement. None of the factors was significantly associated with medial margin involvement. ConclusionEndoscopic-assisted maxillectomy combines several refinements including the facilitated detachment of the maxilla from the skull base and precise delineation of the posterior and medial margins of resection. |
Prognostic implications of pathologic lymph nodes in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers: Clinical validity and strategies for routine clinical practice Publication date: May 2019 Source: Oral Oncology, Volume 92 Author(s): Rama Jayaraj, Chellan Kumarasamy, Madhav Madurantakam Royam, Shanthi Sabarimurugan, Siddhartha Baxi |
Ossified Carcinoma Ex Pleomorphic Adenoma in accessory lobe of parotid gland: Complexity in clinical, imaging and histologic diagnosis and minimally invasive surgery Publication date: May 2019 Source: Oral Oncology, Volume 92 Author(s): Raffaele Rauso, Giuseppe Colella, Renato Franco, Andrea Ronchi, Fabrizio Chirico AbstractCarcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma is not common among malignant salivary tumors and an accessory lobe of parotid gland tumor with a carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma histology is even rarer. Management of these tumors include a high index of suspicion, good understanding of the anatomy and a meticulous surgical access. The exceptional localization of an ossified Carcinoma ex Pleomorphic Adenoma in the accessory lobe of the parotid gland, never reported to date in the literature, has prompted us to report this case to stress the challenging difficulties related to clinical and histologic diagnosis and to analyze a minimally invasive intraoral approach. |
Revisiting and revising the definition of oral submucous fibrosis Publication date: May 2019 Source: Oral Oncology, Volume 92 Author(s): Mohit Sharma, Raghu Radhakrishnan |
OtoRhinoLaryngology by Sfakianakis G.Alexandros Sfakianakis G.Alexandros,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,tel : 00302841026182,00306932607174
Κυριακή 21 Απριλίου 2019
Oral Oncology
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου