Effect of sintering on the translucency of CAD‐CAM lithium disilicate restorations: a comparative in vitro study

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader Effect of sintering on the translucency of CAD‐CAM lithium disilicate restorations: a comparative in vitro study via Journal of Prosthodontics Abstract Purpose The available independent data on the translucency of novel pre and fully sintered chair-side computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) lithium disilicate are limited. This comparative in vitro study evaluated the translucency degree of pre and fully sintered chairside CAD-CAM lithium disilicate crowns after optional, required, and additional firing processes. Materials and Methods One hundred and five maxillary left central incisor crowns manufactured by three different CAD-CAM lithium disilicate brands shade A1 were assigned into 7 groups as follows (n = 15): (1) n!ce Straumann without sintering; (2) n!ce Straumann with one additional sintering process; (3) n!ce Straumann with two additional sintering processes; (4) Amber Mill with one sintering process; (5) Amber Mill with two sintering processes; (6) IPS e.max CAD with one sintering process; (7) IPS e.max CAD with two sintering processes. The translucency of all crowns was evaluated with a color imaging spectrophotometer. All statistical analyses were performed using statistical software. A standard level of significance was set at α < 0.05. Results All the milled crowns presented different degrees of translucency, and additional sintering processes altered it. IPS E.max CAD with two (4.33 ± 0.26) and one (4.01 ± 0.15) sintering processes displayed the highest translucency, whereas n!ce Straumann with no sintering process provided the lowest value (2.82 ± 0.16). Conclusions The translucency of chairside lithium disilicate single-unit full-coverage restorations manufactured with subtractive technology was significantly influenced by the brand and the number of sintering processes. The traditional presintered IPS e.max CAD and the fully crystallized glass-ceramic n!ce Straumann considerably increased the translucency after one additional firing process, whereas Amber Mill decreased its translucency. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved View on Web

Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

Drug‐induced radiation recall reactions and non‐anticancer drugs: A descriptive analysis from VigiBase®

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader Drug‐induced radiation recall reactions and non‐anticancer drugs: A descriptive analysis from VigiBase® via Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology Abstract Background Radiation recall reactions are inflammatory reactions confined to previously irradiated tissues, often of drug-induced etiology, particularly with anticancer therapies. Other drugs, in particular COVID-19 vaccines, may also be involved. Objective To describe radiation recall reactions under non-anticancer drugs more precisely. Material and method We extracted the cases of radiation recall reactions associated with non-anticancer drugs from WHO pharmacovigilance database VigiBase®. We performed two analyses from this extraction: a global analysis and an analysis focusing on vaccination-related issues. Results We extracted 120 cases corresponding to 269 drugs, of which 130 were non-anticancer (22 vaccines). Among the non-anticancer drugs, tozinameran was the most reported treatment (4.46% of cases), followed by levofloxacin (2.97%) and folinic acid (2.60%), dexamethasone (2.23), ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and prednisone (1.86% each). Among vaccines, tozinameran (54.55% of cases) was the most reported, followed by ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (22.73%), HPV & inactivated influenza vaccine (9.09% each), and elasomeran (4.55%). Conclusion Our study first describes the occurrence of radiation recall reactions during non-anticancer treatment. It also highlights a potential safety signal with COVID-19 vaccines. View on Web

Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

Rapid Detection of Monkeypox Virus by Multiple Cross Displacement Amplification Combined with Nanoparticle‐based Biosensor platform

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader Rapid Detection of Monkeypox Virus by Multiple Cross Displacement Amplification Combined with Nanoparticle‐based Biosensor platform via Journal of Medical Virology Abstract The current outbreak of monkeypox virus (MPXV) has become a public health emergency of international concern that highlights the need for rapid, sensitive MPXV diagnostic assays. Here, we combined isothermal multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) with nanoparticle-based lateral flow biosensor (LFB) to devise a diagnostic test for the diagnosis of MPXV infection (called MPXV-MCDA-LFB) and differentiation of West and Central African MPXV isolates. The MPXV-MCDA-LFB protocol conducts isothermal MCDA reaction for DNA templates followed by LFB detection of preamplification target sequences. Two MCDA primer sets were designed targeting the D41L and ATI genes of Central and West African MPXV isolates, respectively, and the optimal condition of two MCDA reactions was 64 ºC for 30 min. The two MCDA reactions were decoded by LFB, which was devised for detecting three targets, including two amplicons yielded from two MCDA reactions and a chromatography contr ol. Thus, the MPXV-MCDA-LFB assay could be completed within 50 min including rapid template preparation (15 min), MCDA reaction (30 min) and reporting of result (< 5 min). The MPXV-MCDA-LFB method is very sensitive and can detect the target genes (D14L and ATI) with as low as five copies of plasmid template per reaction and 12.5 copies of pseudovirus in human blood samples. MPXV-MCDA-LFB assay does not cross-react with non-MPXV templates, validating its specificity. Therefore, the MPXV-MCDA-LFB assay developed here is a useful tool for rapid and reliable diagnosis of MPXV infection. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. View on Web

Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.