from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2A6OUCO
via IFTTT
OtoRhinoLaryngology by Sfakianakis G.Alexandros Sfakianakis G.Alexandros,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,tel : 00302841026182,00306932607174
Publication date: Available online 10 October 2018
Source: Gait & Posture
Author(s): Kylie Davis, John L. Williams, Brooke A. Sanford, Audrey Zucker-Levin
Despite our knowledge of several biomechanical risk factors related to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, such as decreased knee flexion, increased knee abduction, and increased hip flexion, adduction and internal rotation during walking, jogging, and landing from a jump, the incidence of ACL tears remains high. Quantifying variability in the lower extremity provides a continuous measure of joint coordination and function that may elicit an additional aspect of ACL injury mechanisms. Research question: The aim of this study was to assess joint coordination patterns and variability in individuals following ACL reconstruction (ACLR).
Twenty participants with unilateral ACLR and twenty uninjured participants matched by sex and body mass index (BMI) walked over-ground at self-selected speed. Two force plates embedded in the walking platform recorded ground reaction forces (GRF), and a motion capture system collected kinematic data. Vector coding was used to describe coordination patterns and measure coordination variability in hip-knee and knee-ankle coupled motion. Results: Individuals with ACLR had greater variability in hip-knee coordination compared to their healthy counterparts for both the reconstructed and contralateral limbs. The individuals with ACLR also exhibited altered coordination patterns, one of which was characterized by constrained hip motion.
These results are evidence that differences in joint coordination exist between individuals with and without ACLR, even after the former are cleared to return to sport. This new insight into coordinative function after ACLR may be useful for improving rehabilitation strategies as well as identifying those at risk of injury during return to sport testing.
Publication date: Available online 10 October 2018
Source: Gait & Posture
Author(s): Antoni Caserta, Prue Morgan, Cylie Williams
Idiopathic toe walking (ITW) is a diagnosis of exclusion for children walking on their toes with no medical cause. This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate the clinical utility, validity and reliability of the outcome measures and tools used to quantify lower limb changes within studies that included children with ITW.
The following databases were searched from inception until March 2018: Ovid MEDLINE, EBESCO, Embase, CINAHL Plus, PubMed. Inclusion criteria were studies including children with ITW diagnosis, reporting use of measurement tools or methods describing lower limb characteristics, published in peer-reviewed journals, and in English. The relevant psychometric properties of measurement tools were extracted, and assessed for reported reliability and validity. Included articles were assessed for risk of bias using McMaster quality assessment tool. Results were descriptively synthesized and logistic regression used to determine associations between common assessments.
From 3164 retrieved studies, 37 full texts were screened and 27 full texts included. There were 27 different measurement tools described across joint range of motion measurement, gait analysis, electromyography, accelerometer, strength, neurological or radiology assessment. Interventional studies were more likely to report range of motion and gait analysis outcomes, than observational studies. Alvarez classification tool in conjunction with Vicon motion system appeared the contemporary choice for describing ITW gait. There was no significant association between the use of range of motion and gait analysis outcomes and any other outcome tool or assessment in all studies (p > 0.05).There was limited reliability and validity reporting for many outcome measures.
This review highlighted that a consensus statement should be considered to guide clinicians and researchers in the choice of the most important outcome measures for this population. Having a standard set of measures will enable future treatment trials to collect similar measures thus allowing future systematic reviews to compare results.
Publication date: Available online 10 October 2018
Source: Gait & Posture
Author(s): Francisco Locks, Nidhi Gupta, Pascal Madeleine, Marie Birk Jørgensen, Ana Beatriz Oliveira, Andreas Holtermann
Pain in the lower extremities is common among blue-collar workers, with prolonged static standing as a potential risk factor. However, little is known about the association between diurnal accelerometer measures of static standing and pain in the lower extremities, and the potential importance of temporal patterns of static standing for this association.
We aimed to investigate the cross-sectional association between accelerometer measures of total static standing time and temporal patterns (bout duration) of static standing (short: 0-5 min; moderate: >5-10 min; and long bouts: >10 min) during total day, work and leisure and pain intensity (on a 0-10 scale) in hips, knees and feet/ankles.
Accelerometers were used to measure static standing during four consecutive days among 677 blue-collar workers. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate the association between static standing time and pain intensity in the lower extremities.
Total static standing time comprised, on average, 3.9 hours per day. 72.6% of the workers were exposed to long bouts of static standing, averaging 0.1 hours per day. Short bouts of static standing were positively associated with hip and knee pain during total day, and positively associated with knee pain during work. Also, total static standing time during leisure was positively associated with knee and hip pain. A negative, but not significant, association was found for static standing in moderate bouts at work and hip pain.
Even though the associations found were weak, these findings suggest that the temporal pattern of static standing is of importance for pain in the lower extremities. Future research should examine the possibility that moderate bouts of standing could play a role in preventing lower extremity pain.
Publication date: Available online 10 October 2018
Source: Gait & Posture
Author(s): Gerrit Schwiertz, Dennis Brueckner, Simon Schedler, Rainer Kiss, Thomas Muehlbauer
The Lower Quarter Y Balance Test (YBT-LQ) has been widely used in the field to assess dynamic balance performance in various populations. However, no study has demonstrated test-retest reliability of the YBT-LQ in adolescents including several age cohorts, even though reliability is necessary to provide repeatable performance data.
Thus, we examined test-retest reliability of the YBT-LQ in healthy adolescents.
In a school setting, 178 secondary school students (93 female, 85 male) in sixth to eleventh grades (11-19 years) performed the YBT-LQ twice, 7 days apart. Normalized maximal reach distances (% leg length) for all three directions (i.e., anterior, posterolateral, posteromedial) and both legs and the composite score were used as outcome measures. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC3,1) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated to assess relative and absolute test-retest reliability, respectively. Practical relevance of the YBT-LQ was determined by calculating the minimal detectable change (MDC95%).
Irrespective of grade, test-retest reliability for all distances reached was predominately "excellent" (i.e., ICC3,1 > 0.75) and the rather small SEM values ranged from 1.77 to 5.81%. Depending on grade and reach direction, MDC values of 4.90 to 16.10% represent the minimum amount of change needed to identify clinically relevant effects in repeated measurements of the YBT-LQ performance.
The observed values suggest that the YBT-LQ is a reliable test and suitable to detect changes of dynamic balance performance in healthy adolescents from grade six to eleven (i.e., aged 11-19 years).
Publication date: Available online 10 October 2018
Source: Gait & Posture
Author(s): Kylie Davis, John L. Williams, Brooke A. Sanford, Audrey Zucker-Levin
Despite our knowledge of several biomechanical risk factors related to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, such as decreased knee flexion, increased knee abduction, and increased hip flexion, adduction and internal rotation during walking, jogging, and landing from a jump, the incidence of ACL tears remains high. Quantifying variability in the lower extremity provides a continuous measure of joint coordination and function that may elicit an additional aspect of ACL injury mechanisms. Research question: The aim of this study was to assess joint coordination patterns and variability in individuals following ACL reconstruction (ACLR).
Twenty participants with unilateral ACLR and twenty uninjured participants matched by sex and body mass index (BMI) walked over-ground at self-selected speed. Two force plates embedded in the walking platform recorded ground reaction forces (GRF), and a motion capture system collected kinematic data. Vector coding was used to describe coordination patterns and measure coordination variability in hip-knee and knee-ankle coupled motion. Results: Individuals with ACLR had greater variability in hip-knee coordination compared to their healthy counterparts for both the reconstructed and contralateral limbs. The individuals with ACLR also exhibited altered coordination patterns, one of which was characterized by constrained hip motion.
These results are evidence that differences in joint coordination exist between individuals with and without ACLR, even after the former are cleared to return to sport. This new insight into coordinative function after ACLR may be useful for improving rehabilitation strategies as well as identifying those at risk of injury during return to sport testing.
Publication date: Available online 10 October 2018
Source: Gait & Posture
Author(s): Antoni Caserta, Prue Morgan, Cylie Williams
Idiopathic toe walking (ITW) is a diagnosis of exclusion for children walking on their toes with no medical cause. This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate the clinical utility, validity and reliability of the outcome measures and tools used to quantify lower limb changes within studies that included children with ITW.
The following databases were searched from inception until March 2018: Ovid MEDLINE, EBESCO, Embase, CINAHL Plus, PubMed. Inclusion criteria were studies including children with ITW diagnosis, reporting use of measurement tools or methods describing lower limb characteristics, published in peer-reviewed journals, and in English. The relevant psychometric properties of measurement tools were extracted, and assessed for reported reliability and validity. Included articles were assessed for risk of bias using McMaster quality assessment tool. Results were descriptively synthesized and logistic regression used to determine associations between common assessments.
From 3164 retrieved studies, 37 full texts were screened and 27 full texts included. There were 27 different measurement tools described across joint range of motion measurement, gait analysis, electromyography, accelerometer, strength, neurological or radiology assessment. Interventional studies were more likely to report range of motion and gait analysis outcomes, than observational studies. Alvarez classification tool in conjunction with Vicon motion system appeared the contemporary choice for describing ITW gait. There was no significant association between the use of range of motion and gait analysis outcomes and any other outcome tool or assessment in all studies (p > 0.05).There was limited reliability and validity reporting for many outcome measures.
This review highlighted that a consensus statement should be considered to guide clinicians and researchers in the choice of the most important outcome measures for this population. Having a standard set of measures will enable future treatment trials to collect similar measures thus allowing future systematic reviews to compare results.
Publication date: Available online 10 October 2018
Source: Gait & Posture
Author(s): Francisco Locks, Nidhi Gupta, Pascal Madeleine, Marie Birk Jørgensen, Ana Beatriz Oliveira, Andreas Holtermann
Pain in the lower extremities is common among blue-collar workers, with prolonged static standing as a potential risk factor. However, little is known about the association between diurnal accelerometer measures of static standing and pain in the lower extremities, and the potential importance of temporal patterns of static standing for this association.
We aimed to investigate the cross-sectional association between accelerometer measures of total static standing time and temporal patterns (bout duration) of static standing (short: 0-5 min; moderate: >5-10 min; and long bouts: >10 min) during total day, work and leisure and pain intensity (on a 0-10 scale) in hips, knees and feet/ankles.
Accelerometers were used to measure static standing during four consecutive days among 677 blue-collar workers. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate the association between static standing time and pain intensity in the lower extremities.
Total static standing time comprised, on average, 3.9 hours per day. 72.6% of the workers were exposed to long bouts of static standing, averaging 0.1 hours per day. Short bouts of static standing were positively associated with hip and knee pain during total day, and positively associated with knee pain during work. Also, total static standing time during leisure was positively associated with knee and hip pain. A negative, but not significant, association was found for static standing in moderate bouts at work and hip pain.
Even though the associations found were weak, these findings suggest that the temporal pattern of static standing is of importance for pain in the lower extremities. Future research should examine the possibility that moderate bouts of standing could play a role in preventing lower extremity pain.
Publication date: Available online 10 October 2018
Source: Gait & Posture
Author(s): Gerrit Schwiertz, Dennis Brueckner, Simon Schedler, Rainer Kiss, Thomas Muehlbauer
The Lower Quarter Y Balance Test (YBT-LQ) has been widely used in the field to assess dynamic balance performance in various populations. However, no study has demonstrated test-retest reliability of the YBT-LQ in adolescents including several age cohorts, even though reliability is necessary to provide repeatable performance data.
Thus, we examined test-retest reliability of the YBT-LQ in healthy adolescents.
In a school setting, 178 secondary school students (93 female, 85 male) in sixth to eleventh grades (11-19 years) performed the YBT-LQ twice, 7 days apart. Normalized maximal reach distances (% leg length) for all three directions (i.e., anterior, posterolateral, posteromedial) and both legs and the composite score were used as outcome measures. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC3,1) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated to assess relative and absolute test-retest reliability, respectively. Practical relevance of the YBT-LQ was determined by calculating the minimal detectable change (MDC95%).
Irrespective of grade, test-retest reliability for all distances reached was predominately "excellent" (i.e., ICC3,1 > 0.75) and the rather small SEM values ranged from 1.77 to 5.81%. Depending on grade and reach direction, MDC values of 4.90 to 16.10% represent the minimum amount of change needed to identify clinically relevant effects in repeated measurements of the YBT-LQ performance.
The observed values suggest that the YBT-LQ is a reliable test and suitable to detect changes of dynamic balance performance in healthy adolescents from grade six to eleven (i.e., aged 11-19 years).