InCISE: Instrument for Comprehensive Incisional and Surgical Evaluation

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader InCISE: Instrument for Comprehensive Incisional and Surgical Evaluation via The Laryngoscope The evaluation of healing after head and neck surgery is currently qualitative and non-standardized. We developed InCISE: Instrument for comprehensive incisional and surgical evaluation to assess surgical wounds, which was found to be reliable, reproducible, and consistent. Objective The evaluation of healing after head and neck surgery is currently qualitative and non-standardized, limiting the quality of surgical healing assessments in clinical and research settings. We sought to develop an objective, standardized wound assessment score, and hypothesize that a reliable instrument can be developed to evaluate head and neck surgical wounds. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary-care, academic head and neck surgery practice. Patients undergoing head and neck surgery were enrolled. A digital photograph protocol was developed for evaluating healing surgical wounds. A panel of experts developed and refined a wound healing score and established reliability, reproducibility, internal consistency, and validity of the score. Results InCISE: Instrument for comprehensive incisional and surgical evaluation was created. The utility of our wound healing score was assessed using classical test theory. We performed the major steps of establishing reliability in head and neck surgeons: (1) internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.81), (2) inter-observer reliability (intra-class correlation = 0.76), and (3) intra-rater reliability (intra-class correlation = 0.87), and content validity (through focus groups). Our composite measure was found to have strong internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and intra-rater reliability. Preliminary work suggests criterion validity via associations with physical health related quality of life (SF-12). Conclusion A wound healing score for head and neck surgery, InCISE, has been developed and is reliable, reproducible, and consistent. Although content validity is present and criterion validity is suggested, work continues to establish validity in this instrument to allow for expanded clinical and research use. Level of Evidence N/A Laryngoscope, 2022 View on Web

Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

A Nationwide Evaluation of Bevacizumab-based Treatments in Paediatric Low-Grade Glioma in the UK: Safety. Efficacy, Visual Morbidity and Outcomes

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader A Nationwide Evaluation of Bevacizumab-based Treatments in Paediatric Low-Grade Glioma in the UK: Safety. Efficacy, Visual Morbidity and Outcomes via Neuro-Oncology Advance Access Abstract Background Bevacizumab is increasingly used in children with Paediatric Low-Grade Glioma (PLGG) despite limited evidence. A nationwide UK service evaluation was conducted to provide larger cohort 'real life' safety and efficacy data including functional visual outcomes. Methods Children receiving Bevacizumab-based treatments (BBT) for PLGG (2009-2020) from 11 centres were included. Standardised neuro-radiological (RANO-LGG) and visual (logMAR visual acuity) criteria were used to assess clinical-radiological correlation, survival outcomes and multivariate prognostic analysis. Results Eighty-eight children with PLGG received BBT either as 3 rd line with Irinotecan (85%) or alongside 1 st/2 nd line chemotherapies (15%). Toxicity was limited and minimal. Partial response (PR, 40%), stable disease (SD, 49%), and progressive disease (PD, 11%) were seen during BBT. However, 65% progressed at 8 months (median) from BBT cessation, leading to a radiology-based 3yr-progression-free survival (PFS) of 29%. Diencephalic syndrome (p= 0.03) was associated with adverse PFS. Pre-existing visual morbidity included unilateral (25%) or bilateral (11%) blindness. Improvement (29%) or stabilisation (49%) of visual acuity were achieved, more often in patients' best eyes. Vision deteriorated during BBT in 14 (22%), with 3-year visual-PFS of 53%; more often in patients' worst eyes. A superior visual outcome (p=0.023) was seen in Neurofibromatosis type 1-associated Optic Pathway Glioma (OPG). Concordance between visual and radiological responses was 36%; optimised to 48% using only best eye responses. Conclusions BBTs provide effective short-term PLGG control and delay further progression, with a better sustained visual (best >worst eye) than radiological response. Further research could optimise the role of BBTs towards a potentially sight-saving strategy in OPG. View on Web

Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.