Παρασκευή 3 Αυγούστου 2018

Using the Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) System to Investigate Cultural Differences in Conversational Turn Count

Purpose
This study investigates how the variables of culture and hearing status might influence the amount of parent–child talk families engage in throughout an average day.
Method
Seventeen Vietnamese and 8 Canadian families of children with hearing loss and 17 Vietnamese and 13 Canadian families with typically hearing children between the ages of 18 and 48 months old participated in this cross-comparison design study. Each child wore a Language ENvironment Analysis system digital language processor for 3 days. An automated vocal analysis then calculated an average conversational turn count (CTC) for each participant as the variable of investigation. The CTCs for the 4 groups were compared using a Kruskal–Wallis test and a set of planned pairwise comparisons.
Results
The Canadian families participated in significantly more conversational turns than the Vietnamese families. No significant difference was found between the Vietnamese or the Canadian cohorts as a function of hearing status.
Conclusions
Culture, but not hearing status, influences CTCs as derived by the Language ENvironment Analysis system. Clinicians should consider how cultural communication practices might influence their suggestions for language stimulation.

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2AGoCcE
via IFTTT

Code-Switching in Highly Proficient Spanish/English Bilingual Adults: Impact on Masked Word Recognition

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of code-switching on Spanish/English bilingual listeners' speech recognition of English and Spanish words in the presence of competing speech-shaped noise.
Method
Participants were Spanish/English bilingual adults (N = 27) who were highly proficient in both languages. Target stimuli were English and Spanish words presented in speech-shaped noise at a −14-dB signal-to-noise ratio. There were 4 target conditions: (a) English only, (b) Spanish only, (c) mixed English, and (d) mixed Spanish. In the mixed-English condition, 75% of the words were in English, whereas 25% of the words were in Spanish. The percentages were reversed in the mixed-Spanish condition.
Results
Accuracy was poorer for the majority (75%) and minority (25%) languages in both mixed-language conditions compared with the corresponding single-language conditions. Results of a follow-up experiment suggest that this finding cannot be explained in terms of an increase in the number of possible response alternatives for each picture in the mixed-language condition relative to the single-language condition.
Conclusions
Results suggest a cost of language mixing on speech perception when bilingual listeners alternate between languages in noisy environments. In addition, the cost of code-switching on speech recognition in noise was similar for both languages in this group of highly proficient Spanish/English bilingual speakers. Differences in response-set size could not account for the poorer results in the mixed-language conditions.

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2OJ1yNl
via IFTTT

Using the Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) System to Investigate Cultural Differences in Conversational Turn Count

Purpose
This study investigates how the variables of culture and hearing status might influence the amount of parent–child talk families engage in throughout an average day.
Method
Seventeen Vietnamese and 8 Canadian families of children with hearing loss and 17 Vietnamese and 13 Canadian families with typically hearing children between the ages of 18 and 48 months old participated in this cross-comparison design study. Each child wore a Language ENvironment Analysis system digital language processor for 3 days. An automated vocal analysis then calculated an average conversational turn count (CTC) for each participant as the variable of investigation. The CTCs for the 4 groups were compared using a Kruskal–Wallis test and a set of planned pairwise comparisons.
Results
The Canadian families participated in significantly more conversational turns than the Vietnamese families. No significant difference was found between the Vietnamese or the Canadian cohorts as a function of hearing status.
Conclusions
Culture, but not hearing status, influences CTCs as derived by the Language ENvironment Analysis system. Clinicians should consider how cultural communication practices might influence their suggestions for language stimulation.

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2AGoCcE
via IFTTT

Code-Switching in Highly Proficient Spanish/English Bilingual Adults: Impact on Masked Word Recognition

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of code-switching on Spanish/English bilingual listeners' speech recognition of English and Spanish words in the presence of competing speech-shaped noise.
Method
Participants were Spanish/English bilingual adults (N = 27) who were highly proficient in both languages. Target stimuli were English and Spanish words presented in speech-shaped noise at a −14-dB signal-to-noise ratio. There were 4 target conditions: (a) English only, (b) Spanish only, (c) mixed English, and (d) mixed Spanish. In the mixed-English condition, 75% of the words were in English, whereas 25% of the words were in Spanish. The percentages were reversed in the mixed-Spanish condition.
Results
Accuracy was poorer for the majority (75%) and minority (25%) languages in both mixed-language conditions compared with the corresponding single-language conditions. Results of a follow-up experiment suggest that this finding cannot be explained in terms of an increase in the number of possible response alternatives for each picture in the mixed-language condition relative to the single-language condition.
Conclusions
Results suggest a cost of language mixing on speech perception when bilingual listeners alternate between languages in noisy environments. In addition, the cost of code-switching on speech recognition in noise was similar for both languages in this group of highly proficient Spanish/English bilingual speakers. Differences in response-set size could not account for the poorer results in the mixed-language conditions.

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2OJ1yNl
via IFTTT

Comparison the time to stabilization and activity of the lower extremity muscles during jump-landing in subjects with and without Genu Varum

Publication date: Available online 3 August 2018

Source: Gait & Posture

Author(s): Zahed Mantashloo, Mohsen Moradi, Amir Letafatkar

Abstract
Background

Knee muscles activity changes from Genu Varum deformity(GVD), may cause this individual more exposed to lower extremity injuries especially in high-risk activities like landing.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the activity of the lower limb stabilizer muscles during jump-landing and time to stabilization(TTS) in subjects with and without GVD.

Method

A total of 44 men (group 1, with GVD n = 22 and group 2, without GVD n = 22); with mean age = 17.6 ± 3.12 years, height = 178.2 ± 5.39 cm, mass = 80.39 ± 8.3 kg) participated in this study.

Subjects were asked to do a jump-landing task and Quadratus Lumborum(QL), Gluteus Maximus(GMax), Gluteus Medius(GMed), Biceps Femoris (BF), Semitendinosus, and Medial Gastrocnemius(MG) muscles activity was recorded. Also, changes in the amount of ground reaction force(GRF) were used to an indicator for TTS.

Results

Our results showed that subjects with GVD had increased QL activity before(P = 0.008) and after(P = 0.017) landing. But, these subjects had a decreased activity of GMed compared to the healthy ones before(P = 0.033) and after(P = 0.005) landing. but there was no statistically significant difference before landing in gluteus maximus(P = 0.252), biceps femoris(P = 0.613), semitendinosus(P = 0.313), and medial gastrocnemius(P = 0.140) muscles and after landing in gluteus maximus (P = 0.246), biceps femoris(P = 0.512), semitendinosus(P = 0.214), and medial gastrocnemius(P = 0.209) muscles between the two groups. Also, the TTS was higher in subjects with GV than healthy ones in the Resultant Vector TTS (P = 0.015) and medial-lateral(P = 0.013) directions.

Conclusions

The altered activity of the QL and GMed, in subjects with GVD may indicate instability of the spinal column, pelvis and hip during jump-landing task. Although the GVD is referred to the frontal plane deformity, the results showed that this complication might affect stability in other motion planes.



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2vfTWd5
via IFTTT

Fallers with Parkinson’s disease exhibit restrictive trunk control during walking

Publication date: Available online 3 August 2018

Source: Gait & Posture

Author(s): Deborah Jehu, Julie Nantel

Abstract
Background

The relationship between falls and static and dynamic postural control has not been established in Parkinson’s disease (PD). The purpose was to compare the compensatory postural strategies among fallers and non-fallers with PD as well as older adults during static and dynamic movements.

Methods

Twenty-five individuals with PD (11 fallers) and 17 older adults were outfitted with 6 accelerometers on the wrists, ankles, lumbar spine, and sternum, stood quietly for 30 s on a force platform, and walked back and forth for 30 s along a 15 m walkway. Root-mean-square displacement amplitude of the center of pressure (COP), COP velocity, gait spatial-temporal characteristics, trunk range of motion (ROM), and peak trunk velocities were obtained.

Results

COP velocity in anterior-posterior was larger in older adults than those with PD (p < 0.05). Trunk frontal ROM and velocity were smaller in fallers and non-fallers with PD compared to older adults (p < 0.05). Trunk anterior-posterior ROM and velocity were smaller in fallers than non-fallers with PD and older adults (p < 0.05). In fallers with PD, negative correlations were shown between the sagittal trunk velocity and the COP velocity in the anterior-posterior direction as well as between trunk frontal velocity and COP velocity in both directions (p < 0.05). In non-fallers with PD, horizontal trunk ROM and velocity were positively correlated with COP ROM and velocity in the medial-lateral direction (p < 0.01).

Significance

Dynamic postural control revealed better discrimination between groups than static. Fallers and non-fallers with PD and older adults adopted different compensatory strategies during static and dynamic movements; thereby providing important information for falls-risk assessment.



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2ACY7Vs
via IFTTT

Comparison the time to stabilization and activity of the lower extremity muscles during jump-landing in subjects with and without Genu Varum

Publication date: Available online 3 August 2018

Source: Gait & Posture

Author(s): Zahed Mantashloo, Mohsen Moradi, Amir Letafatkar

Abstract
Background

Knee muscles activity changes from Genu Varum deformity(GVD), may cause this individual more exposed to lower extremity injuries especially in high-risk activities like landing.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the activity of the lower limb stabilizer muscles during jump-landing and time to stabilization(TTS) in subjects with and without GVD.

Method

A total of 44 men (group 1, with GVD n = 22 and group 2, without GVD n = 22); with mean age = 17.6 ± 3.12 years, height = 178.2 ± 5.39 cm, mass = 80.39 ± 8.3 kg) participated in this study.

Subjects were asked to do a jump-landing task and Quadratus Lumborum(QL), Gluteus Maximus(GMax), Gluteus Medius(GMed), Biceps Femoris (BF), Semitendinosus, and Medial Gastrocnemius(MG) muscles activity was recorded. Also, changes in the amount of ground reaction force(GRF) were used to an indicator for TTS.

Results

Our results showed that subjects with GVD had increased QL activity before(P = 0.008) and after(P = 0.017) landing. But, these subjects had a decreased activity of GMed compared to the healthy ones before(P = 0.033) and after(P = 0.005) landing. but there was no statistically significant difference before landing in gluteus maximus(P = 0.252), biceps femoris(P = 0.613), semitendinosus(P = 0.313), and medial gastrocnemius(P = 0.140) muscles and after landing in gluteus maximus (P = 0.246), biceps femoris(P = 0.512), semitendinosus(P = 0.214), and medial gastrocnemius(P = 0.209) muscles between the two groups. Also, the TTS was higher in subjects with GV than healthy ones in the Resultant Vector TTS (P = 0.015) and medial-lateral(P = 0.013) directions.

Conclusions

The altered activity of the QL and GMed, in subjects with GVD may indicate instability of the spinal column, pelvis and hip during jump-landing task. Although the GVD is referred to the frontal plane deformity, the results showed that this complication might affect stability in other motion planes.



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2vfTWd5
via IFTTT

Fallers with Parkinson’s disease exhibit restrictive trunk control during walking

Publication date: Available online 3 August 2018

Source: Gait & Posture

Author(s): Deborah Jehu, Julie Nantel

Abstract
Background

The relationship between falls and static and dynamic postural control has not been established in Parkinson’s disease (PD). The purpose was to compare the compensatory postural strategies among fallers and non-fallers with PD as well as older adults during static and dynamic movements.

Methods

Twenty-five individuals with PD (11 fallers) and 17 older adults were outfitted with 6 accelerometers on the wrists, ankles, lumbar spine, and sternum, stood quietly for 30 s on a force platform, and walked back and forth for 30 s along a 15 m walkway. Root-mean-square displacement amplitude of the center of pressure (COP), COP velocity, gait spatial-temporal characteristics, trunk range of motion (ROM), and peak trunk velocities were obtained.

Results

COP velocity in anterior-posterior was larger in older adults than those with PD (p < 0.05). Trunk frontal ROM and velocity were smaller in fallers and non-fallers with PD compared to older adults (p < 0.05). Trunk anterior-posterior ROM and velocity were smaller in fallers than non-fallers with PD and older adults (p < 0.05). In fallers with PD, negative correlations were shown between the sagittal trunk velocity and the COP velocity in the anterior-posterior direction as well as between trunk frontal velocity and COP velocity in both directions (p < 0.05). In non-fallers with PD, horizontal trunk ROM and velocity were positively correlated with COP ROM and velocity in the medial-lateral direction (p < 0.01).

Significance

Dynamic postural control revealed better discrimination between groups than static. Fallers and non-fallers with PD and older adults adopted different compensatory strategies during static and dynamic movements; thereby providing important information for falls-risk assessment.



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2ACY7Vs
via IFTTT

P 063 – Quantifying the separate effects of Botulinum Toxin-A and lower leg casting on ankle joint hyper-resistance in children with cerebral palsy

Publication date: Available online 3 August 2018

Source: Gait & Posture

Author(s): L. Bar-On, B. Hanssen, N. Peeters, S. H. Schless, A. Van Campenhout, K. Desloovere



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2M4ri8m
via IFTTT

P 063 – Quantifying the separate effects of Botulinum Toxin-A and lower leg casting on ankle joint hyper-resistance in children with cerebral palsy

Publication date: Available online 3 August 2018

Source: Gait & Posture

Author(s): L. Bar-On, B. Hanssen, N. Peeters, S. H. Schless, A. Van Campenhout, K. Desloovere



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2M4ri8m
via IFTTT

Structure of mouse protocadherin 15 of the stereocilia tip link in complex with LHFPL5.

Structure of mouse protocadherin 15 of the stereocilia tip link in complex with LHFPL5.

Elife. 2018 Aug 02;7:

Authors: Ge J, Elferich J, Goehring A, Zhao J, Schuck P, Gouaux E

Abstract
Hearing and balance involve the transduction of mechanical stimuli into electrical signals by deflection of bundles of stereocilia linked together by protocadherin 15 (PCDH15) and cadherin 23 'tip links'. PCDH15 transduces tip link tension into opening of a mechano-electrical transduction (MET) ion channel. PCDH15 also interacts with LHFPL5, a candidate subunit of the MET channel. Here we illuminate the PCDH15-LHFPL5 structure, showing how the complex is composed of PCDH15 and LHFPL5 subunit pairs related by a 2-fold axis. The extracellular cadherin domains define a mobile tether coupled to a rigid, 2-fold symmetric 'collar' proximal to the membrane bilayer. LHFPL5 forms extensive interactions with the PCDH15 transmembrane helices and stabilizes the overall PCDH15-LHFPL5 assembly. Our studies illuminate the architecture of the PCDH15-LHFPL5 complex, localize mutations associated with deafness, and shed new light on how forces in the PCDH15 tether may be transduced into the stereocilia membrane.

PMID: 30070639 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2vz1c38
via IFTTT

Structure of mouse protocadherin 15 of the stereocilia tip link in complex with LHFPL5.

Structure of mouse protocadherin 15 of the stereocilia tip link in complex with LHFPL5.

Elife. 2018 Aug 02;7:

Authors: Ge J, Elferich J, Goehring A, Zhao J, Schuck P, Gouaux E

Abstract
Hearing and balance involve the transduction of mechanical stimuli into electrical signals by deflection of bundles of stereocilia linked together by protocadherin 15 (PCDH15) and cadherin 23 'tip links'. PCDH15 transduces tip link tension into opening of a mechano-electrical transduction (MET) ion channel. PCDH15 also interacts with LHFPL5, a candidate subunit of the MET channel. Here we illuminate the PCDH15-LHFPL5 structure, showing how the complex is composed of PCDH15 and LHFPL5 subunit pairs related by a 2-fold axis. The extracellular cadherin domains define a mobile tether coupled to a rigid, 2-fold symmetric 'collar' proximal to the membrane bilayer. LHFPL5 forms extensive interactions with the PCDH15 transmembrane helices and stabilizes the overall PCDH15-LHFPL5 assembly. Our studies illuminate the architecture of the PCDH15-LHFPL5 complex, localize mutations associated with deafness, and shed new light on how forces in the PCDH15 tether may be transduced into the stereocilia membrane.

PMID: 30070639 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2vz1c38
via IFTTT

Background Speech Disrupts Working Memory Span in 5-Year-Old Children

Objectives: The present study tested the effects of background speech and nonspeech noise on 5-year-old children’s working memory span. Design: Five-year-old typically developing children (range = 58.6 to 67.6 months; n = 94) completed a modified version of the Missing Scan Task, a missing-item working memory task, in quiet and in the presence of two types of background noise: male two-talker speech and speech-shaped noise. The two types of background noise had similar spectral composition and overall intensity characteristics but differed in whether they contained verbal content. In Experiments 1 and 2, children’s memory span (i.e., the largest set size of items children successfully recalled) was subjected to analyses of variance designed to look for an effect of listening condition (within-subjects factor: quiet, background noise) and an effect of background noise type (between-subjects factor: two-talker speech, speech-shaped noise). Results: In Experiment 1, children’s memory span declined in the presence of two-talker speech but not in the presence of speech-shaped noise. This result was replicated in Experiment 2 after accounting for a potential effect of proactive interference due to repeated administration of the Missing Scan Task. Conclusions: Background speech, but not speech-shaped noise, disrupted working memory span in 5-year-old children. These results support the idea that background speech engages domain-general cognitive processes used during the recall of known objects in a way that speech-shaped noise does not. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The authors thank the families who participated in the study and Dr. Beverly Wright for helpful comments on the manuscript. Partial funding for this study was provided by an Undergraduate Research Grant from Northwestern University awarded to M.-S.C. for completion of an undergraduate honors thesis. T.M.G.-C., M.-S.C., and H.E.S. designed the experiments. M.-S.C., H.E.S., and K.M.W. performed the experiments. T.M.G.-C. and K.M.W. analyzed the data. T.M.G.-C. wrote the manuscript with comments from M.-S.C., H.E.S., and K.M.W. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Address for correspondence: Tina M. Grieco-Calub, The Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Room 2–246, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. E-mail: tinagc@northwestern.edu Received December 1, 2017; accepted May 31, 2018. Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2O76JWf
via IFTTT

Voice Emotion Recognition by Children With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss

Objectives: Emotional communication is important in children’s social development. Previous studies have shown deficits in voice emotion recognition by children with moderate-to-severe hearing loss or with cochlear implants. Little, however, is known about emotion recognition in children with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. The objective of this study was to compare voice emotion recognition by children with mild-to-moderate hearing loss relative to their peers with normal hearing, under conditions in which the emotional prosody was either more or less exaggerated (child-directed or adult-directed speech, respectively). We hypothesized that the performance of children with mild-to-moderate hearing loss would be comparable to their normally hearing peers when tested with child-directed materials but would show significant deficits in emotion recognition when tested with adult-directed materials, which have reduced prosodic cues. Design: Nineteen school-aged children (8 to 14 years of age) with mild-to-moderate hearing loss and 20 children with normal hearing aged 6 to 17 years participated in the study. A group of 11 young, normally hearing adults was also tested. Stimuli comprised sentences spoken in one of five emotions (angry, happy, sad, neutral, and scared), either in a child-directed or in an adult-directed manner. The task was a single-interval, five-alternative forced-choice paradigm, in which the participants heard each sentence in turn and indicated which of the five emotions was associated with that sentence. Reaction time was also recorded as a measure of cognitive load. Results: Acoustic analyses confirmed the exaggerated prosodic cues in the child-directed materials relative to the adult-directed materials. Results showed significant effects of age, specific emotion (happy, sad, etc.), and test materials (better performance with child-directed materials) in both groups of children, as well as susceptibility to talker variability. Contrary to our hypothesis, no significant differences were observed between the 2 groups of children in either emotion recognition (percent correct or d' values) or in reaction time, with either child- or adult-directed materials. Among children with hearing loss, degree of hearing loss (mild or moderate) did not predict performance. In children with hearing loss, interactions between vocabulary, materials, and age were observed, such that older children with stronger vocabulary showed better performance with child-directed speech. Such interactions were not observed in children with normal hearing. The pattern of results was broadly consistent across the different measures of accuracy, d', and reaction time. Conclusions: Children with mild-to-moderate hearing loss do not have significant deficits in overall voice emotion recognition compared with their normally hearing peers, but mechanisms involved may be different between the 2 groups. The results suggest a stronger role for linguistic ability in emotion recognition by children with normal hearing than by children with hearing loss. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The authors would like to thank Sara Damm, Aditya Kulkarni, Julie Christensen, Mohsen Hozan, Barbara Peterson, Meredith Spratford, Sara Robinson, and Sarah Al-Salim for their help with this work. The authors would also like to thank Joshua Sevier and Phylicia Bediako for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article. Portions of this work were presented at the 2016 annual conference of the American Auditory Society held in Scottsdale, Arizona. This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01 DC014233 and R21 DC011905, the Clinical Management Core of NIH grant P20 GM10923, and the Human Research Subject Core of P30 DC004662. S. Cannon was supported by NIH grant number T35 DC008757 and R01 DC014233 04S1. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Address for correspondence: Monita Chatterjee, Auditory Prostheses & Perception Lab, Boys Town National Research Hospital, 425 N 30th St, Omaha, NE 68131, USA. E-mail: monita.chatterjee@boystown.org Received September 19, 2017; accepted June 2, 2018. Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2LMgzjC
via IFTTT

Background Speech Disrupts Working Memory Span in 5-Year-Old Children

Objectives: The present study tested the effects of background speech and nonspeech noise on 5-year-old children’s working memory span. Design: Five-year-old typically developing children (range = 58.6 to 67.6 months; n = 94) completed a modified version of the Missing Scan Task, a missing-item working memory task, in quiet and in the presence of two types of background noise: male two-talker speech and speech-shaped noise. The two types of background noise had similar spectral composition and overall intensity characteristics but differed in whether they contained verbal content. In Experiments 1 and 2, children’s memory span (i.e., the largest set size of items children successfully recalled) was subjected to analyses of variance designed to look for an effect of listening condition (within-subjects factor: quiet, background noise) and an effect of background noise type (between-subjects factor: two-talker speech, speech-shaped noise). Results: In Experiment 1, children’s memory span declined in the presence of two-talker speech but not in the presence of speech-shaped noise. This result was replicated in Experiment 2 after accounting for a potential effect of proactive interference due to repeated administration of the Missing Scan Task. Conclusions: Background speech, but not speech-shaped noise, disrupted working memory span in 5-year-old children. These results support the idea that background speech engages domain-general cognitive processes used during the recall of known objects in a way that speech-shaped noise does not. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The authors thank the families who participated in the study and Dr. Beverly Wright for helpful comments on the manuscript. Partial funding for this study was provided by an Undergraduate Research Grant from Northwestern University awarded to M.-S.C. for completion of an undergraduate honors thesis. T.M.G.-C., M.-S.C., and H.E.S. designed the experiments. M.-S.C., H.E.S., and K.M.W. performed the experiments. T.M.G.-C. and K.M.W. analyzed the data. T.M.G.-C. wrote the manuscript with comments from M.-S.C., H.E.S., and K.M.W. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Address for correspondence: Tina M. Grieco-Calub, The Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Room 2–246, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. E-mail: tinagc@northwestern.edu Received December 1, 2017; accepted May 31, 2018. Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2O76JWf
via IFTTT

Voice Emotion Recognition by Children With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss

Objectives: Emotional communication is important in children’s social development. Previous studies have shown deficits in voice emotion recognition by children with moderate-to-severe hearing loss or with cochlear implants. Little, however, is known about emotion recognition in children with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. The objective of this study was to compare voice emotion recognition by children with mild-to-moderate hearing loss relative to their peers with normal hearing, under conditions in which the emotional prosody was either more or less exaggerated (child-directed or adult-directed speech, respectively). We hypothesized that the performance of children with mild-to-moderate hearing loss would be comparable to their normally hearing peers when tested with child-directed materials but would show significant deficits in emotion recognition when tested with adult-directed materials, which have reduced prosodic cues. Design: Nineteen school-aged children (8 to 14 years of age) with mild-to-moderate hearing loss and 20 children with normal hearing aged 6 to 17 years participated in the study. A group of 11 young, normally hearing adults was also tested. Stimuli comprised sentences spoken in one of five emotions (angry, happy, sad, neutral, and scared), either in a child-directed or in an adult-directed manner. The task was a single-interval, five-alternative forced-choice paradigm, in which the participants heard each sentence in turn and indicated which of the five emotions was associated with that sentence. Reaction time was also recorded as a measure of cognitive load. Results: Acoustic analyses confirmed the exaggerated prosodic cues in the child-directed materials relative to the adult-directed materials. Results showed significant effects of age, specific emotion (happy, sad, etc.), and test materials (better performance with child-directed materials) in both groups of children, as well as susceptibility to talker variability. Contrary to our hypothesis, no significant differences were observed between the 2 groups of children in either emotion recognition (percent correct or d' values) or in reaction time, with either child- or adult-directed materials. Among children with hearing loss, degree of hearing loss (mild or moderate) did not predict performance. In children with hearing loss, interactions between vocabulary, materials, and age were observed, such that older children with stronger vocabulary showed better performance with child-directed speech. Such interactions were not observed in children with normal hearing. The pattern of results was broadly consistent across the different measures of accuracy, d', and reaction time. Conclusions: Children with mild-to-moderate hearing loss do not have significant deficits in overall voice emotion recognition compared with their normally hearing peers, but mechanisms involved may be different between the 2 groups. The results suggest a stronger role for linguistic ability in emotion recognition by children with normal hearing than by children with hearing loss. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The authors would like to thank Sara Damm, Aditya Kulkarni, Julie Christensen, Mohsen Hozan, Barbara Peterson, Meredith Spratford, Sara Robinson, and Sarah Al-Salim for their help with this work. The authors would also like to thank Joshua Sevier and Phylicia Bediako for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article. Portions of this work were presented at the 2016 annual conference of the American Auditory Society held in Scottsdale, Arizona. This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01 DC014233 and R21 DC011905, the Clinical Management Core of NIH grant P20 GM10923, and the Human Research Subject Core of P30 DC004662. S. Cannon was supported by NIH grant number T35 DC008757 and R01 DC014233 04S1. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Address for correspondence: Monita Chatterjee, Auditory Prostheses & Perception Lab, Boys Town National Research Hospital, 425 N 30th St, Omaha, NE 68131, USA. E-mail: monita.chatterjee@boystown.org Received September 19, 2017; accepted June 2, 2018. Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2LMgzjC
via IFTTT