from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2M9pEPG
via IFTTT
OtoRhinoLaryngology by Sfakianakis G.Alexandros Sfakianakis G.Alexandros,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,tel : 00302841026182,00306932607174
Publication date: Available online 1 August 2018
Source: Gait & Posture
Author(s): C. Schranz, A. Kruse, T. Belohlavek, G. Steinwender, M. Tilp, M. Svehlik
Publication date: Available online 1 August 2018
Source: Gait & Posture
Author(s): B. Pobatschnig, B. Dumphart, A. Kranzl
The Gait Profile Score (GPS) is used as a summary index to interpret gait abnormalities compared to a reference group, but stance phase shifts in gait cycles are not considered. The aim of this work is to point out, if stance phase shifts affects the GPS estimations and lead clinically relevant changes.
Publication date: Available online 1 August 2018
Source: Gait & Posture
Author(s): C. Schranz, A. Kruse, T. Belohlavek, G. Steinwender, M. Tilp, M. Svehlik
Publication date: Available online 1 August 2018
Source: Gait & Posture
Author(s): B. Pobatschnig, B. Dumphart, A. Kranzl
The Gait Profile Score (GPS) is used as a summary index to interpret gait abnormalities compared to a reference group, but stance phase shifts in gait cycles are not considered. The aim of this work is to point out, if stance phase shifts affects the GPS estimations and lead clinically relevant changes.
Related Articles |
Developing the auditory processing domains questionnaire (APDQ): a differential screening tool for auditory processing disorder.
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jul 31;:1-12
Authors: O'Hara B, Mealings K
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a screening questionnaire for auditory processing disorder (APD).
DESIGN: Fifty-two questions were created to enable parent/teacher proxies to rate students listening skills in terms of auditory processing, attention and language factors.
STUDY SAMPLE: Parents rated their child's frequency of competent performance (regularly, often, sometimes or rarely) on 52 questions. Scores were calculated for three scales: auditory processing, attention and language. Data was collected from 198 normal controls, 20 students with auditory processing disorder, 40 students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and 10 students with a learning disability. Subjects were split into a younger group (7-10 y) and an older group (11-17 y).
RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed substantial internal validity. Analysis of external validity using a regression model revealed significant differences between normal and clinical groups for all scales (p < 0.001) and also significantly separated the three clinical groups. A group differential analysis of scale score results clearly demonstrated inter-group differences at 89% (on average) sensitivity and specificity levels.
CONCLUSION: The auditory processing domains questionnaire appears to be an effective screening questionnaire for APD with scale score patterns likely to be helpful in making appropriate clinical referrals.
PMID: 30063869 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Related Articles |
Developing the auditory processing domains questionnaire (APDQ): a differential screening tool for auditory processing disorder.
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jul 31;:1-12
Authors: O'Hara B, Mealings K
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a screening questionnaire for auditory processing disorder (APD).
DESIGN: Fifty-two questions were created to enable parent/teacher proxies to rate students listening skills in terms of auditory processing, attention and language factors.
STUDY SAMPLE: Parents rated their child's frequency of competent performance (regularly, often, sometimes or rarely) on 52 questions. Scores were calculated for three scales: auditory processing, attention and language. Data was collected from 198 normal controls, 20 students with auditory processing disorder, 40 students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and 10 students with a learning disability. Subjects were split into a younger group (7-10 y) and an older group (11-17 y).
RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed substantial internal validity. Analysis of external validity using a regression model revealed significant differences between normal and clinical groups for all scales (p < 0.001) and also significantly separated the three clinical groups. A group differential analysis of scale score results clearly demonstrated inter-group differences at 89% (on average) sensitivity and specificity levels.
CONCLUSION: The auditory processing domains questionnaire appears to be an effective screening questionnaire for APD with scale score patterns likely to be helpful in making appropriate clinical referrals.
PMID: 30063869 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Related Articles |
Developing the auditory processing domains questionnaire (APDQ): a differential screening tool for auditory processing disorder.
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jul 31;:1-12
Authors: O'Hara B, Mealings K
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a screening questionnaire for auditory processing disorder (APD).
DESIGN: Fifty-two questions were created to enable parent/teacher proxies to rate students listening skills in terms of auditory processing, attention and language factors.
STUDY SAMPLE: Parents rated their child's frequency of competent performance (regularly, often, sometimes or rarely) on 52 questions. Scores were calculated for three scales: auditory processing, attention and language. Data was collected from 198 normal controls, 20 students with auditory processing disorder, 40 students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and 10 students with a learning disability. Subjects were split into a younger group (7-10 y) and an older group (11-17 y).
RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed substantial internal validity. Analysis of external validity using a regression model revealed significant differences between normal and clinical groups for all scales (p < 0.001) and also significantly separated the three clinical groups. A group differential analysis of scale score results clearly demonstrated inter-group differences at 89% (on average) sensitivity and specificity levels.
CONCLUSION: The auditory processing domains questionnaire appears to be an effective screening questionnaire for APD with scale score patterns likely to be helpful in making appropriate clinical referrals.
PMID: 30063869 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Related Articles |
Developing the auditory processing domains questionnaire (APDQ): a differential screening tool for auditory processing disorder.
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jul 31;:1-12
Authors: O'Hara B, Mealings K
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a screening questionnaire for auditory processing disorder (APD).
DESIGN: Fifty-two questions were created to enable parent/teacher proxies to rate students listening skills in terms of auditory processing, attention and language factors.
STUDY SAMPLE: Parents rated their child's frequency of competent performance (regularly, often, sometimes or rarely) on 52 questions. Scores were calculated for three scales: auditory processing, attention and language. Data was collected from 198 normal controls, 20 students with auditory processing disorder, 40 students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and 10 students with a learning disability. Subjects were split into a younger group (7-10 y) and an older group (11-17 y).
RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed substantial internal validity. Analysis of external validity using a regression model revealed significant differences between normal and clinical groups for all scales (p < 0.001) and also significantly separated the three clinical groups. A group differential analysis of scale score results clearly demonstrated inter-group differences at 89% (on average) sensitivity and specificity levels.
CONCLUSION: The auditory processing domains questionnaire appears to be an effective screening questionnaire for APD with scale score patterns likely to be helpful in making appropriate clinical referrals.
PMID: 30063869 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Related Articles |
FGFR1-mediated protocadherin-15 loading mediates cargo specificity during intraflagellar transport in inner ear hair-cell kinocilia.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 30;:
Authors: Honda A, Kita T, Seshadri SV, Misaki K, Ahmed Z, Ladbury JE, Richardson GP, Yonemura S, Ladher RK
Abstract
The mechanosensory hair cells of the inner ear are required for hearing and balance and have a distinctive apical structure, the hair bundle, that converts mechanical stimuli into electrical signals. This structure comprises a single cilium, the kinocilium, lying adjacent to an ensemble of actin-based projections known as stereocilia. Hair bundle polarity depends on kinociliary protocadherin-15 (Pcdh15) localization. Protocadherin-15 is found only in hair-cell kinocilia, and is not localized to the primary cilia of adjacent supporting cells. Thus, Pcdh15 must be specifically targeted and trafficked into the hair-cell kinocilium. Here we show that kinocilial Pcdh15 trafficking relies on cell type-specific coupling to the generic intraflagellar transport (IFT) transport mechanism. We uncover a role for fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) in loading Pcdh15 onto kinociliary transport particles in hair cells. We find that on activation, FGFR1 binds and phosphorylates Pcdh15. Moreover, we find a previously uncharacterized role for clathrin in coupling this kinocilia-specific cargo with the anterograde IFT-B complex through the adaptor, DAB2. Our results identify a modified ciliary transport pathway used for Pcdh15 transport into the cilium of the inner ear hair cell and coordinated by FGFR1 activity.
PMID: 30061390 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Related Articles |
FGFR1-mediated protocadherin-15 loading mediates cargo specificity during intraflagellar transport in inner ear hair-cell kinocilia.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 30;:
Authors: Honda A, Kita T, Seshadri SV, Misaki K, Ahmed Z, Ladbury JE, Richardson GP, Yonemura S, Ladher RK
Abstract
The mechanosensory hair cells of the inner ear are required for hearing and balance and have a distinctive apical structure, the hair bundle, that converts mechanical stimuli into electrical signals. This structure comprises a single cilium, the kinocilium, lying adjacent to an ensemble of actin-based projections known as stereocilia. Hair bundle polarity depends on kinociliary protocadherin-15 (Pcdh15) localization. Protocadherin-15 is found only in hair-cell kinocilia, and is not localized to the primary cilia of adjacent supporting cells. Thus, Pcdh15 must be specifically targeted and trafficked into the hair-cell kinocilium. Here we show that kinocilial Pcdh15 trafficking relies on cell type-specific coupling to the generic intraflagellar transport (IFT) transport mechanism. We uncover a role for fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) in loading Pcdh15 onto kinociliary transport particles in hair cells. We find that on activation, FGFR1 binds and phosphorylates Pcdh15. Moreover, we find a previously uncharacterized role for clathrin in coupling this kinocilia-specific cargo with the anterograde IFT-B complex through the adaptor, DAB2. Our results identify a modified ciliary transport pathway used for Pcdh15 transport into the cilium of the inner ear hair cell and coordinated by FGFR1 activity.
PMID: 30061390 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]