from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/25pfzWf
via IFTTT
OtoRhinoLaryngology by Sfakianakis G.Alexandros Sfakianakis G.Alexandros,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,tel : 00302841026182,00306932607174
The behavior of intracochlear distortion products (iDPs) was inferred by interacting a probe tone (f3) with the iDP of interest to produce a “secondary” distortion product otoacoustic emission termed DPOAE2ry. Measures of the DPOAE2ry were then used to deduce the properties of the iDP. This approach was used in alert rabbits and anesthetized gerbils to compare ear-canal 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 DPOAE f2/f1 ratio functions, level/phase (L/P) maps, and interference-response areas (IRAs) to their simultaneously collected DPOAE2ry counterparts. These same measures were also collected in a human volunteer to demonstrate similarities with their laboratory animal counterparts and their potential applicability to humans. Results showed that DPOAEs and inferred iDPs evidenced distinct behaviors and properties. That is, DPOAE ratio functions elicited by low-level primaries peaked around an f2/f1 = 1.21 or 1.25, depending on species, while the corresponding inferred iDP ratio functions peaked at f2/f1 ratios of ~1. Additionally, L/P maps showed rapid phase variation with DPOAE frequency (fdp) for the narrow-ratio 2f1-f2 and all 2f2-f1 DPOAEs, while the corresponding DPOAE2ry measures evidenced relatively constant phases. Common features of narrow-ratio DPOAE IRAs, such as large enhancements for interference tones (ITs) presented above f2, were not present in DPOAE2ry IRAs. Finally, based on prior experiments in gerbils, the behavior of the iDP directly measured in intracochlear pressure was compared to the iDP inferred from the DPOAE2ry and found to be similar. Together, these findings are consistent with the notion that under certain conditions, ear-canal DPOAEs provide poor representations of iDPs and thus support a “beamforming” hypothesis. According to this concept, distributed emission components directed toward the ear canal from the f2 and basal to f2 regions can be of differing phases and thus cancel, while these same components directed toward fdp add in phase.
by Alexandra L. Quittner, Ivette Cejas, Nae-Yuh Wang, John K. Niparko, David H. Barker
In the largest, longitudinal study of young, deaf children before and three years after cochlear implantation, we compared symbolic play and novel noun learning to age-matched hearing peers. Participants were 180 children from six cochlear implant centers and 96 hearing children. Symbolic play was measured during five minutes of videotaped, structured solitary play. Play was coded as "symbolic" if the child used substitution (e.g., a wooden block as a bed). Novel noun learning was measured in 10 trials using a novel object and a distractor. Cochlear implant vs. normal hearing children were delayed in their use of symbolic play, however, those implanted before vs. after age two performed significantly better. Children with cochlear implants were also delayed in novel noun learning (median delay 1.54 years), with minimal evidence of catch-up growth. Quality of parent-child interactions was positively related to performance on the novel noun learning, but not symbolic play task. Early implantation was beneficial for both achievement of symbolic play and novel noun learning. Further, maternal sensitivity and linguistic stimulation by parents positively affected noun learning skills, although children with cochlear implants still lagged in comparison to hearing peers.Limited exposure to ambiguous auditory stimuli results in perceptual recalibration. When unambiguous stimuli are used instead, selective adaptation (SA) effects have been reported, even after few adaptor presentations. Crucially, selective adaptation by an ambiguous sound in biasing lexical contexts had previously been found only after massive adaptor repetition [Samuel (2001). Psychol. Sci. 12(4), 348–351]. The present study shows that extensive exposure is not necessary for lexically driven selective adaptation to occur. Lexically driven selective adaptation can arise after as few as nine adaptor presentations. Additionally, build-up course inspection reveals several parallelisms with the time course observed for SA with unambiguous stimuli.
Limited exposure to ambiguous auditory stimuli results in perceptual recalibration. When unambiguous stimuli are used instead, selective adaptation (SA) effects have been reported, even after few adaptor presentations. Crucially, selective adaptation by an ambiguous sound in biasing lexical contexts had previously been found only after massive adaptor repetition [Samuel (2001). Psychol. Sci. 12(4), 348–351]. The present study shows that extensive exposure is not necessary for lexically driven selective adaptation to occur. Lexically driven selective adaptation can arise after as few as nine adaptor presentations. Additionally, build-up course inspection reveals several parallelisms with the time course observed for SA with unambiguous stimuli.
Does clinician continuity influence hearing aid outcomes?
Int J Audiol. 2016 May 25;:1-8
Authors: Bennett RJ, Meyer C, Eikelboom RH
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether clinician continuity is associated with successful hearing aid outcomes.
DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. Clinician continuity was defined as occurring when a patient was cared for by the same clinician for the hearing assessment, hearing aid selection process, hearing aid fitting and programming, and subsequent hearing aid fine tuning appointments. The hearing aid outcome measures included self-reported hearing aid use, benefit and satisfaction as well as self-reported handling skills and problems experienced with hearing aids.
STUDY SAMPLE: Four hundred and sixty-eight adult hearing aid users (mean age 73.9 years ±10.9) and 26 qualified audiologists (mean age 34 years ±6.34) recruited from a single hearing clinic in Perth, Western Australia.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in hearing aid outcomes between participants who experienced clinician continuity and those who did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Within a controlled practice setting, hearing aid outcomes may not be adversely effected if services are provided by more than one clinician.
PMID: 27224042 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Book Review.
Int J Audiol. 2016 May 25;:1
Authors: Baguley DM, Fagelson M
PMID: 27223682 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Does clinician continuity influence hearing aid outcomes?
Int J Audiol. 2016 May 25;:1-8
Authors: Bennett RJ, Meyer C, Eikelboom RH
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether clinician continuity is associated with successful hearing aid outcomes.
DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. Clinician continuity was defined as occurring when a patient was cared for by the same clinician for the hearing assessment, hearing aid selection process, hearing aid fitting and programming, and subsequent hearing aid fine tuning appointments. The hearing aid outcome measures included self-reported hearing aid use, benefit and satisfaction as well as self-reported handling skills and problems experienced with hearing aids.
STUDY SAMPLE: Four hundred and sixty-eight adult hearing aid users (mean age 73.9 years ±10.9) and 26 qualified audiologists (mean age 34 years ±6.34) recruited from a single hearing clinic in Perth, Western Australia.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in hearing aid outcomes between participants who experienced clinician continuity and those who did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Within a controlled practice setting, hearing aid outcomes may not be adversely effected if services are provided by more than one clinician.
PMID: 27224042 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Book Review.
Int J Audiol. 2016 May 25;:1
Authors: Baguley DM, Fagelson M
PMID: 27223682 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Does clinician continuity influence hearing aid outcomes?
Int J Audiol. 2016 May 25;:1-8
Authors: Bennett RJ, Meyer C, Eikelboom RH
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether clinician continuity is associated with successful hearing aid outcomes.
DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. Clinician continuity was defined as occurring when a patient was cared for by the same clinician for the hearing assessment, hearing aid selection process, hearing aid fitting and programming, and subsequent hearing aid fine tuning appointments. The hearing aid outcome measures included self-reported hearing aid use, benefit and satisfaction as well as self-reported handling skills and problems experienced with hearing aids.
STUDY SAMPLE: Four hundred and sixty-eight adult hearing aid users (mean age 73.9 years ±10.9) and 26 qualified audiologists (mean age 34 years ±6.34) recruited from a single hearing clinic in Perth, Western Australia.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in hearing aid outcomes between participants who experienced clinician continuity and those who did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Within a controlled practice setting, hearing aid outcomes may not be adversely effected if services are provided by more than one clinician.
PMID: 27224042 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Book Review.
Int J Audiol. 2016 May 25;:1
Authors: Baguley DM, Fagelson M
PMID: 27223682 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Does clinician continuity influence hearing aid outcomes?
Int J Audiol. 2016 May 25;:1-8
Authors: Bennett RJ, Meyer C, Eikelboom RH
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether clinician continuity is associated with successful hearing aid outcomes.
DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. Clinician continuity was defined as occurring when a patient was cared for by the same clinician for the hearing assessment, hearing aid selection process, hearing aid fitting and programming, and subsequent hearing aid fine tuning appointments. The hearing aid outcome measures included self-reported hearing aid use, benefit and satisfaction as well as self-reported handling skills and problems experienced with hearing aids.
STUDY SAMPLE: Four hundred and sixty-eight adult hearing aid users (mean age 73.9 years ±10.9) and 26 qualified audiologists (mean age 34 years ±6.34) recruited from a single hearing clinic in Perth, Western Australia.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in hearing aid outcomes between participants who experienced clinician continuity and those who did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Within a controlled practice setting, hearing aid outcomes may not be adversely effected if services are provided by more than one clinician.
PMID: 27224042 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Book Review.
Int J Audiol. 2016 May 25;:1
Authors: Baguley DM, Fagelson M
PMID: 27223682 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
![]() |
Related Articles |
Deaf Adolescents' Learning of Cardiovascular Health Information: Sources and Access Challenges.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015 Oct;20(4):408-18
Authors: Smith SR, Kushalnagar P, Hauser PC
Abstract
Deaf individuals have more cardiovascular risks than the general population that are believed to be related to their cardiovascular health knowledge disparities. This phenomenological study describes where 20 deaf sign language-using adolescents from Rochester, New York, many who possess many positive characteristics to support their health literacy, learn cardiovascular health information and their lived experiences accessing health information. The goal is to ultimately use this information to improve the delivery of cardiovascular health education to this population and other deaf adolescents at a higher risk for weak health literacy. Deaf bilingual researchers interviewed deaf adolescents, transcribed and coded the data, and described the findings. Five major sources of cardiovascular health information were identified including family, health education teachers, healthcare providers, printed materials, and informal sources. Despite possessing advantageous characteristics contributing to stronger health literacy, study participants described significant challenges with accessing health information from each source. They also demonstrated inconsistencies in their cardiovascular health knowledge, especially regarding heart attack, stroke, and cholesterol. These findings suggest a great need for additional public funding to research deaf adolescents' informal health-related learning, develop accessible and culturally appropriate health surveys and health education programming, improve interpreter education, and disseminate information through social media.
PMID: 26048900 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]