OtoRhinoLaryngology by Sfakianakis G.Alexandros Sfakianakis G.Alexandros,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,tel : 00302841026182,00306932607174
Τετάρτη 23 Μαΐου 2018
Effects of Amplification and Hearing Aid Experience on the Contribution of Specific Frequency Bands to Loudness
from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2KONUWa
via IFTTT
Heritability of Age-Related Hearing Loss in Middle-Aged and Elderly Chinese: A Population-Based Twin Study
from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2s4XVrm
via IFTTT
Effects of Amplification and Hearing Aid Experience on the Contribution of Specific Frequency Bands to Loudness
from #Audiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2KONUWa
via IFTTT
Heritability of Age-Related Hearing Loss in Middle-Aged and Elderly Chinese: A Population-Based Twin Study
from #Audiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2s4XVrm
via IFTTT
Effects of Amplification and Hearing Aid Experience on the Contribution of Specific Frequency Bands to Loudness
from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2KONUWa
via IFTTT
Heritability of Age-Related Hearing Loss in Middle-Aged and Elderly Chinese: A Population-Based Twin Study
from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2s4XVrm
via IFTTT
Using aided cortical assessment as an objective tool to evaluate cochlear implant fitting in users with single-sided deafness.
Related Articles |
Using aided cortical assessment as an objective tool to evaluate cochlear implant fitting in users with single-sided deafness.
PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0193081
Authors: Távora-Vieira D, Wedekind A, Marino R, Purdy SC, Rajan GP
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the use of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) to verify, and if necessary, optimize the cochlear implant (CI) fitting of adult CI users with postlingual single-sided deafness (SSD).
METHODS: Sound field cortical responses to the speech tokens /m/, /g/, /t/, and /s/ were recorded from input to the CI while the normal hearing ear was masked. Responses were evaluated by visual inspection and classified as presence or absence of the CAEPs components P1, N1, P2. In case of an absence fitting was adjusted accordingly. After fitting, subjects were asked to use their new setting for 2-3 weeks for acclimatization purposes and then return for retesting. At retesting, new CAEP recordings were performed to objectively ensure that the new fitting maps effectively activated the auditory cortex.
RESULTS: In 14/19 subjects, as per visual inspection, clear CAEPs were recorded by each speech token and were, therefore, not refit. In the other 5 subjects, CAEPs could not be evoked for at least one speech token. The fitting maps in these subjects were adjusted until clear CAEPs were evoked for all 4 speech tokens.
CONCLUSIONS: CAEP can be used to quickly and objectively verify the suitability of CI fitting in experienced adult CI users with SSD. If used in the early post-implantation stage, this method could help CI users derive greater benefit for CI use and, therefore, be more committed to auditory training.
PMID: 29470548 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2F17AqQ
via IFTTT
Using aided cortical assessment as an objective tool to evaluate cochlear implant fitting in users with single-sided deafness.
Related Articles |
Using aided cortical assessment as an objective tool to evaluate cochlear implant fitting in users with single-sided deafness.
PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0193081
Authors: Távora-Vieira D, Wedekind A, Marino R, Purdy SC, Rajan GP
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the use of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) to verify, and if necessary, optimize the cochlear implant (CI) fitting of adult CI users with postlingual single-sided deafness (SSD).
METHODS: Sound field cortical responses to the speech tokens /m/, /g/, /t/, and /s/ were recorded from input to the CI while the normal hearing ear was masked. Responses were evaluated by visual inspection and classified as presence or absence of the CAEPs components P1, N1, P2. In case of an absence fitting was adjusted accordingly. After fitting, subjects were asked to use their new setting for 2-3 weeks for acclimatization purposes and then return for retesting. At retesting, new CAEP recordings were performed to objectively ensure that the new fitting maps effectively activated the auditory cortex.
RESULTS: In 14/19 subjects, as per visual inspection, clear CAEPs were recorded by each speech token and were, therefore, not refit. In the other 5 subjects, CAEPs could not be evoked for at least one speech token. The fitting maps in these subjects were adjusted until clear CAEPs were evoked for all 4 speech tokens.
CONCLUSIONS: CAEP can be used to quickly and objectively verify the suitability of CI fitting in experienced adult CI users with SSD. If used in the early post-implantation stage, this method could help CI users derive greater benefit for CI use and, therefore, be more committed to auditory training.
PMID: 29470548 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2F17AqQ
via IFTTT
Determinants of Hearing Aid Use Among Older Americans With Hearing Loss.
Determinants of Hearing Aid Use Among Older Americans With Hearing Loss.
Gerontologist. 2018 May 21;:
Authors: McKee MM, Choi H, Wilson S, DeJonckheere MJ, Zazove P, Levy H
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Hearing loss (HL) is common among older adults and is associated with significant psychosocial, cognitive, and physical sequelae. Hearing aids (HA) can help, but not all individuals with HL use them. This study examines how social determinants may impact HA use.
Research Design and Methods: We conducted an explanatory sequential mixed methods study involving a secondary analysis of a nationally representative data set, the Health and Retirement Study (HRS; n = 35,572). This was followed up with 1:1 qualitative interviews (n = 21) with community participants to clarify our findings. Both samples included individuals aged 55 and older with a self-reported HL, with or without HA. The main outcome measure was the proportion of participants with a self-reported HL who use HA.
Results and Discussion: Analysis of HRS data indicated that younger, nonwhite, non-Hispanic, lower income, and less-educated individuals were significantly less likely to use HA than their referent groups (all p values < .001). Area of residence (e.g., urban) were not significantly associated with HA use. Qualitative findings revealed barriers to HA included cost, stigma, vanity, and a general low priority placed on addressing HL by health care providers. Facilitators to obtaining and using HA included family/friend support, knowledge, and adequate insurance coverage for HA.
Implications: Many socioeconomic factors hinder individuals' ability to obtain and use HA, but these obstacles appeared to be mitigated in part when insurance plans provided adequate HA coverage, or when their family/friends provided encouragement to use HA.
PMID: 29788270 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
from #Audiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2IBbxoy
via IFTTT