from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2nC7REe
via IFTTT
OtoRhinoLaryngology by Sfakianakis G.Alexandros Sfakianakis G.Alexandros,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,tel : 00302841026182,00306932607174
The Schumann resonator, which is also called the Schumann Frequenzgenerator, is a machine that generates a magnetic pulse at the same frequency of the Earth’s. The Earth’s magnetic pulse frequency was discovered in 1953 by Professor Schumann of the University of Munich. He was able to apply that frequency to solve problems that were experienced by some of the earliest astronauts. Today, the Shumann resonator is used by people on solid land who are experiencing troubling symptoms that impact their quality of life.
History of the Schumann Frequenzgenerator
In 1954, Schumann’s successor, a Dr. Herbert Konig, confirmed that the Earth’s magnetic frequency is 7.83 Hz. In later years, other medical researchers and scientists found that human brain waves operate at the same frequency as the Earth’s magnetic pulse. Today, it is possible to buy a portable Shumann resonator to plug into your car or use in your home in order to restore these natural pulses into your life.
How the Schumann Frequenzgenerator Works
The Shumann resonator uses electricity to vibrate magnets, which then pulse at the frequency of 7.83 Hz. It can also be set to include a 10.2 Hz frequency. These natural frequencies are thought to be the optimal levels that allow for healthy functioning of biological tissues and structures in the brain, such as the hippocampus.
Who May Use a Schumann Frequenzgenerator
You may benefit from the use of a Schumann resonator if you have been feeling out of sorts, especially if you spend a lot of time surrounded by other signals. This includes signals that come from cell phones, radios, TVs, cell phone towers, electrical lines and heavily trafficked roads. The Schumann resonator may benefit you if you have vague, waxing and waning symptoms such as low libido, restlessness, low energy, irritability, headaches and a sense of fatigue when in your home, at work or in your car.
Benefits of Using the Schumann Frequenzgenerator
Using the Schumann resonator at home, at work or in your car may help you to experience a sense of calm and reduced tension. Setting up the Schumann resonator in your bedroom and using it at night may help to reduce problems such as bad dreams, sleeplessness and sleep that is not restful. Many people find that the Schumann resonator helps to reduce brain fog and feelings of sadness, irritability, depression or apathy. You may also notice a boost in digestive system functioning.
Related Articles |
Corrigendum.
Int J Audiol. 2017 Mar 11;:1
Authors:
PMID: 28285558 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Related Articles |
Novel Mutations and Mutation Combinations of TMPRSS3 Cause Various Phenotypes in One Chinese Family with Autosomal Recessive Hearing Impairment.
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4707315
Authors: Gao X, Yuan YY, Wang GJ, Xu JC, Su Y, Lin X, Dai P
Abstract
Autosomal recessive hearing impairment with postlingual onset is rare. Exceptions are caused by mutations in the TMPRSS3 gene, which can lead to prelingual (DFNB10) as well as postlingual deafness (DFNB8). TMPRSS3 mutations can be classified as mild or severe, and the phenotype is dependent on the combination of TMPRSS3 mutations. The combination of two severe mutations leads to profound hearing impairment with a prelingual onset, whereas severe mutations in combination with milder TMPRSS3 mutations lead to a milder phenotype with postlingual onset. We characterized a Chinese family (number FH1523) with not only prelingual but also postlingual hearing impairment. Three mutations in TMPRSS3, one novel mutation c.36delC [p.(Phe13Serfs⁎12)], and two previously reported pathogenic mutations, c.916G>A (p.Ala306Thr) and c.316C>T (p.Arg106Cys), were identified. Compound heterozygous mutations of p.(Phe13Serfs⁎12) and p.Ala306Thr manifest as prelingual, profound hearing impairment in the patient (IV: 1), whereas the combination of p.Arg106Cys and p.Ala306Thr manifests as postlingual, milder hearing impairment in the patient (II: 2, II: 3, II: 5), suggesting that p.Arg106Cys mutation has a milder effect than p.(Phe13Serfs⁎12). We concluded that different combinations of TMPRSS3 mutations led to different hearing impairment phenotypes (DFNB8/DFNB10) in this family.
PMID: 28246597 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Related Articles |
Hearing devices for children with unilateral hearing loss: Patient- and parent-reported perspectives.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;90:43-48
Authors: Purcell PL, Jones-Goodrich R, Wisneski M, Edwards TC, Sie KC
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Management of children with unilateral hearing loss is not standardized. The primary goal of this study was to elicit patient- and parent-reported perspectives regarding usage of hearing devices in pediatric UHL and to suggest a basic algorithmic approach to management.
METHODS: Our tertiary care center recruited families of youth ages 5-19 years with unilateral hearing loss from January 2014 through October 2015. Parents of all youths completed a 36-item survey, and some youth ages 11-19 years participated in hour-long interviews. We assessed patterns of hearing device usage among participants, and performed qualitative data analysis to understand factors considered by youths when deciding whether or not to use a hearing device.
RESULTS: Survey information was collected for 50 patients. Distribution of hearing loss severity in affected ear was mild 14%, moderate 26%, severe 22%, and profound 38%. The majority of children had sensorineural hearing loss (57%), followed by mixed (32%), and then conductive (11%). 34 children (68%) had tried a hearing device; 20 continued to use the device. Retention rates were similar among children with different degrees of hearing loss: mild 66%, moderate 50%, severe 60%, profound 64%. Sixteen children tried a wireless contralateral routing of signal (CROS) device, and 15 tried a behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aid. Retention rates for CROS and BTE devices were 69% and 47%, respectively. The most common reason for cessation of use was discomfort, followed by lack of benefit.
CONCLUSION: A majority of children with unilateral hearing loss who tried a hearing device continued to use it, and retention rates were similar across all degrees of hearing loss. These findings suggest that personal hearing devices should be included in management protocols.
PMID: 27729150 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Related Articles |
Follow-up in newborn hearing screening - A systematic review.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;90:29-36
Authors: Ravi R, Gunjawate DR, Yerraguntla K, Lewis LE, Driscoll C, Rajashekhar B
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The quality and efficiency of newborn hearing screening programs (NHS) rely heavily on appropriate follow-up. The Joint Committee on Infant Hearing recommends a follow-up rate of more than 95% of infants who fail the initial hearing screening. However, a 70% benchmark is considered to be more feasible. This high loss to follow-up (LTF) rate acts as a threat to the overall success of NHS programs. The objective of the study was to identify and examine the reported rates of LTF, attributed reasons for LTF and strategies undertaken to reduce LTF.
METHODS: Using a systematic search, articles published between 2005 to December 2015 were identified from PubMed/Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), Scopus, Ovid, ProQuest, and Cochrane Library. To be included in the review, the study should be exploring the loss to follow-up or drop-out rate in newborn hearing screening programs and be published in an indexed peer-reviewed journal in the English language. The main outcome measures were overall rate of LTF, factors leading to LTF and measures adopted to overcome LTF.
RESULTS: 53 articles were short-listed for data extraction. Out of these, 27 were single-centre studies, 19 were multi-centre, 3 compared multiple databases, and 4 used survey-based methods. Overall LTF rates of 20% in single-centre and 21% in multiple-centre studies were observed. Educational disparity and lack of adequate knowledge among parents were associated with LTF. The most commonly used strategy to overcome LTF suggested by studies was the use of an adequate data management system.
CONCLUSION: This review is a novel attempt to explore the LTF among NHS studies, reasons for LTF and strategies to reduce LTF. This review can act as a basis for planning and execution of effective NHS programs.
PMID: 27729148 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Related Articles |
Level of emotion comprehension in children with mid to long term cochlear implant use: How basic and more complex emotion recognition relates to language and age at implantation.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Aug;87:219-32
Authors: Mancini P, Giallini I, Prosperini L, D'alessandro HD, Guerzoni L, Murri A, Cuda D, Ruoppolo G, De Vincentiis M, Nicastri M
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The current study was designed with three main aims: To document the level of emotional comprehension skills, from basic to more complex ones, reached by a wide sample of cochlear implant (CI) deaf children with at least 36 months of device use; To investigate subjective and audiological factors that can affect their emotional development; To identify, if present, a "critical age", in which early intervention might positively affect adequate emotional competence development.
DESIGN: This is an observational cohort study. Children with congenital severe/profound deafness were selected based on: aged by 4-11 years, minimum of 36 months of CI use, Italian as the primary language in the family; normal cognitive level and absence of associated disorders or socio-economic difficulties. Audiological characteristics and language development were assessed throughout standardized tests, to measure speech perception in quiet, lexical comprehension and production. The development of emotions' understanding was assessed using the Test of Emotion Comprehension (TEC) of Pons and Harris, a hierarchical developmental model, where emotion comprehension is organized in 3 Stages (external, mental and reflective). Statistical analysis was accomplished via the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient, to study the relationship between the personal and audiological characteristics; a multivariate linear regression analysis was carried out to find which variables were better associated with the standardized TEC values; a chi-squared test with Yate's continuity correction and Mann-Whitney U test were used to account for differences between continuous variables and proportions.
RESULTS: 72 children (40 females, 32 males) with a mean age of 8.1 years were included. At TEC score, 57 children showed normal range performances (79.17% of recipients) and 15 fell below average (20.83% of recipients). The 16.63% of older subjects (range of age 8-12 years) didn't master the Stage 3 (reflective), which is normally acquired by 8 years of age and failed 2 or all the 3 items of this component. Subjects implanted within 18 months of age had better emotion comprehension skills. TEC results were also positively correlated with an early diagnosis, a longer implant use, better auditory skills and higher scores on lexical and morphosintactic tests. On the contrary, it was negatively correlated with the presence of siblings and the order of birth. The gender, the side and the severity of deafness, type of implant and strategy were not correlated.
CONCLUSIONS: Early implanted children have more chance to develop adequate emotion comprehension, especially when the complex aspects are included, due to the very strong link between listening and language skills and emotional development. Furthermore, longer CI auditory experience along with early intervention allows an adequate communication development which positively influences the acquisition of such competencies.
PMID: 27368475 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Related Articles |
Corrigendum.
Int J Audiol. 2017 Mar 11;:1
Authors:
PMID: 28285558 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Related Articles |
Corrigendum.
Int J Audiol. 2017 Mar 11;:1
Authors:
PMID: 28285558 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Related Articles |
Corrigendum.
Int J Audiol. 2017 Mar 11;:1
Authors:
PMID: 28285558 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]