Κυριακή 24 Ιουλίου 2022

Endoscopic trans‐lateral oropharyngeal wall approach to the petrous apex and the petroclival region

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Background

A trans-lateral oropharyngeal wall approach (TLOWA) to the petrous apex has not been previously defined. This study aims to assess the feasibility of a TLOWA for surgical access to the petrous apex and the petroclival region.

Methods

An endoscopic TLOWA for exposure of the petrous apex and petroclival region was performed on five cadaveric specimens (10 sides). Associated anatomical landmarks were defined, and the strategies for maximal exposure of the internal carotid artery (ICA) were explored.

Results

Via a TLOWA, the parapharyngeal ICA was widely exposed in all 10 sides. Following transection of the Eustachian tube, the inferior petrous apex and petroclival region could be sufficiently exposed. After drilling the anteroinferior bony canal, the horizontal petrous ICA, foramen lacerum, and the paraclival ICA could be adequately revealed.

Conclusion

The TLOWA may provide an alternative corridor for access to the petrous apex and the petroclival region. The parapharyngeal, petrous, lower paraclival ICAs, and the foramen lacerum could be adequately exposed via the TLOWA.

View on Web

Interferon‐gamma inducible protein 16 and type I interferon receptors expression in experimental apical periodontitis induced in wild type mice

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the IFI16 and IFN-α/β receptors expression during the genesis and development of experimental apical periodontitis (AP) in mice teeth.

Methodology

AP was induced in the lower first molars of 40 C57BL/6 mice. They were divided according to the experimental periods 2, 7, 14, 21 and 42 days (n=8 per group). Five animals were used as a control group (without AP). Specimens were submitted to histological processing for description of the inflammatory process, immunostaining for the presence/absence and localization of IFI16 and IFN-α/β receptors (qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) histoenzimology.

Results

The results showed a gradual development of AP over the experimental times. The expression of IFI16 was noticeably more exacerbated in the experimental early period (day 2) while the lowest expression was observed in the control group (p=0.02). For IFN-α/β receptors, a higher intensity staining was observed 42 days after AP induction, that was statistically different from the control group (p=0.02). Also, the number of TRAP positive cells was higher on the later periods (days 21 and 42) (p<0.001).

Conclusion

IFI16 protein expression was highest during the early periods after apical periodontitis induction in mice teeth, whilst IFN-α/β receptors expression was highest after apical periodontitis became established.

View on Web

Risk factor analysis for cytomegalovirus reactivation under prophylaxis with letermovir after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Background

Letermovir has been approved as a novel cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylactic agent after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, there are still insufficient data to properly evaluate the real-world role of letermovir, and the risk factors for CMV reactivation under letermovir prophylaxis have not been clarified.

Methods

We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients under prophylaxis with or without letermovir who underwent allogeneic HSCT between March 2012 and December 2019. In August 2018, letermovir was added to the clinical practice at our institution for the prophylaxis of CMV reactivation in allogeneic SCT recipients. Patients who underwent SCT without prophylactic letermovir from March 2012 until September 2018 served as a historical control.

Results

The cumulative incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi) was significantly lower in the letermovir group than in the historical control group not receiving letermovir (30.2% vs 71.6%, P < 0.05, at 100 days). In addition, the cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) at day 500 was significantly lower in the letermovir group (4.7% vs 19.8%, P < 0.05). We then performed a risk factor analysis for developing CS-CMVi in the letermovir group. The only significant factor identified by this multivariable analysis was transplantation from a CMV seronegative donor to a seropositive recipient (HR = 2.76, 95% confidence interval 1.14 – 6.68, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Our study showed that letermovir prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence of CS-CMVi and NRM in a real-world setting and that the CMV serostatus of the donor remained as a risk factor for CS-CMVi even under letermovir prophylaxis.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

View on Web