from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2AxavkE
via IFTTT
OtoRhinoLaryngology by Sfakianakis G.Alexandros Sfakianakis G.Alexandros,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,tel : 00302841026182,00306932607174
InnerScope Hearing Technologies (http://www.innd.com/) has entered into a letter of intent (LOI) for an exclusive worldwide licensing and distribution for the FlexiHub Software as it relates to remote programming of hearing aids. The FlexiHub Software, created by Eltima Software GmbH, is a USB-over-Ethernet technology that allows total secure access and connection remotely via the internet for sharing of USB port devices to any remote computers around the world or using an Android smartphone. Hearing care providers can use the FlexiHub to remotely program and adjust their patients' hearing aids remotely, reducing the number of clinic visits for fine-tuning adjustments of hearing aids. InnerScope plans to make the FlexiHub available through a monthly or yearly subscription for hearing professionals and hearing aid users. Under the LOI, the company will also be able to white label the software and sublicense the use for other teleaudiology software platforms to global retailers and manufactures of hearing aid devices and other hearing augmented technologies.
InnerScope Hearing Technologies (http://www.innd.com/) has entered into a letter of intent (LOI) for an exclusive worldwide licensing and distribution for the FlexiHub Software as it relates to remote programming of hearing aids. The FlexiHub Software, created by Eltima Software GmbH, is a USB-over-Ethernet technology that allows total secure access and connection remotely via the internet for sharing of USB port devices to any remote computers around the world or using an Android smartphone. Hearing care providers can use the FlexiHub to remotely program and adjust their patients' hearing aids remotely, reducing the number of clinic visits for fine-tuning adjustments of hearing aids. InnerScope plans to make the FlexiHub available through a monthly or yearly subscription for hearing professionals and hearing aid users. Under the LOI, the company will also be able to white label the software and sublicense the use for other teleaudiology software platforms to global retailers and manufactures of hearing aid devices and other hearing augmented technologies.
InnerScope Hearing Technologies (http://www.innd.com/) has entered into a letter of intent (LOI) for an exclusive worldwide licensing and distribution for the FlexiHub Software as it relates to remote programming of hearing aids. The FlexiHub Software, created by Eltima Software GmbH, is a USB-over-Ethernet technology that allows total secure access and connection remotely via the internet for sharing of USB port devices to any remote computers around the world or using an Android smartphone. Hearing care providers can use the FlexiHub to remotely program and adjust their patients' hearing aids remotely, reducing the number of clinic visits for fine-tuning adjustments of hearing aids. InnerScope plans to make the FlexiHub available through a monthly or yearly subscription for hearing professionals and hearing aid users. Under the LOI, the company will also be able to white label the software and sublicense the use for other teleaudiology software platforms to global retailers and manufactures of hearing aid devices and other hearing augmented technologies.
Related Articles |
Dystonia-deafness syndrome caused by a β-actin gene mutation and response to deep brain stimulation.
Mov Disord. 2017 Jan;32(1):162-165
Authors: Eggink H, van Egmond ME, Verschuuren-Bemelmans CC, Schönherr MC, de Koning TJ, Oterdoom DL, van Dijk JM, Tijssen MA
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Dystonia-deafness syndrome is a distinct clinical presentation within the dystonia-spectrum. Although several genetic and acquired causes have been reported, etiology remains unknown in the majority of patients.
OBJECTIVES: To describe two patients with dystonia-deafness syndrome due to a beta-actin gene mutation.
METHODS: We report on disease course, genetic testing, and management of 2 patients, mother and daughter, presenting with dystonia-deafness syndrome.
RESULTS: After exclusion of known dystonia-deafness syndrome causes, whole-exome sequencing revealed a beta-actin gene mutation (p.Arg183Trp) in both patients. Although beta-actin gene mutations are generally associated with developmental Baraitser-Winter syndrome, dystonia-deafness syndrome has been reported once in identical twin brothers. Bilateral GPi-DBS led to a significant decrease of dystonia and regain of independency in our patients.
CONCLUSION: The p.Arg183Trp mutation in the beta-actin gene is associated with the clinical presentation of dystonia-deafness syndrome, even with only minimal or no developmental abnormalities of Baraitser-Winter syndrome. GPi-DBS should be considered to ameliorate the invalidating dystonia in these patients. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
PMID: 27862284 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Related Articles |
The reduction of gunshot noise and auditory risk through the use of firearm suppressors and low-velocity ammunition.
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jan 04;:1-14
Authors: Murphy WJ, Flamme GA, Campbell AR, Zechmann EL, Tasko SM, Lankford JE, Meinke DK, Finan DS, Stewart M
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This research assessed the reduction of peak levels, equivalent energy and sound power of firearm suppressors.
DESIGN: The first study evaluated the effect of three suppressors at four microphone positions around four firearms. The second study assessed the suppressor-related reduction of sound power with a 3 m hemispherical microphone array for two firearms.
RESULTS: The suppressors reduced exposures at the ear between 17 and 24 dB peak sound pressure level and reduced the 8 h equivalent A-weighted energy between 9 and 21 dB depending upon the firearm and ammunition. Noise reductions observed for the instructor's position about a metre behind the shooter were between 20 and 28 dB peak sound pressure level and between 11 and 26 dB LAeq,8h. Firearm suppressors reduced the measured sound power levels between 2 and 23 dB. Sound power reductions were greater for the low-velocity ammunition than for the same firearms fired with high-velocity ammunition due to the effect of N-waves produced by a supersonic bullet.
CONCLUSIONS: Firearm suppressors may reduce noise exposure, and the cumulative exposures of suppressed firearms can still present a significant hearing risk. Therefore, firearm users should always wear hearing protection whenever target shooting or hunting.
PMID: 29299940 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Related Articles |
Is non-linear frequency compression amplification beneficial to adults and children with hearing loss? A systematic review.
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jan 03;:1-12
Authors: Akinseye GA, Dickinson AM, Munro KJ
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the benefits of non-linear frequency compression (NLFC) in adults and children.
DESIGN: Ten databases were searched for studies comparing the effects of NLFC and conventional processing (CP) for the period January 2008 to September 2017.
STUDY SAMPLE: Twelve articles were included in this review: four adults and school-aged only, one pre-school only and three with both adults and school-aged children.
RESULTS: A two-stage process was implemented to grade the evidence. The individual studies were graded based on their study type (from 1 = highest quality of evidence to 5 = the lowest quality) and then sub-graded based on their quality ("a" for "good quality" or "b" for "lesser quality"). All studies were awarded 4a, except the single pre-school study, which was awarded 2a. The overall evidence for each population was graded based on the quality, quantity and consistency of the studies. The body of evidence was rated as very low for both adults and school-aged children, but high for pre-school children.
CONCLUSION: The low number (and quality) of studies means that evidence supporting the benefit from NLFC is inconclusive. Further high-quality RCTs are required to provide a conclusive answer to this question.
PMID: 29298522 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Related Articles |
The reduction of gunshot noise and auditory risk through the use of firearm suppressors and low-velocity ammunition.
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jan 04;:1-14
Authors: Murphy WJ, Flamme GA, Campbell AR, Zechmann EL, Tasko SM, Lankford JE, Meinke DK, Finan DS, Stewart M
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This research assessed the reduction of peak levels, equivalent energy and sound power of firearm suppressors.
DESIGN: The first study evaluated the effect of three suppressors at four microphone positions around four firearms. The second study assessed the suppressor-related reduction of sound power with a 3 m hemispherical microphone array for two firearms.
RESULTS: The suppressors reduced exposures at the ear between 17 and 24 dB peak sound pressure level and reduced the 8 h equivalent A-weighted energy between 9 and 21 dB depending upon the firearm and ammunition. Noise reductions observed for the instructor's position about a metre behind the shooter were between 20 and 28 dB peak sound pressure level and between 11 and 26 dB LAeq,8h. Firearm suppressors reduced the measured sound power levels between 2 and 23 dB. Sound power reductions were greater for the low-velocity ammunition than for the same firearms fired with high-velocity ammunition due to the effect of N-waves produced by a supersonic bullet.
CONCLUSIONS: Firearm suppressors may reduce noise exposure, and the cumulative exposures of suppressed firearms can still present a significant hearing risk. Therefore, firearm users should always wear hearing protection whenever target shooting or hunting.
PMID: 29299940 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Related Articles |
Is non-linear frequency compression amplification beneficial to adults and children with hearing loss? A systematic review.
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jan 03;:1-12
Authors: Akinseye GA, Dickinson AM, Munro KJ
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the benefits of non-linear frequency compression (NLFC) in adults and children.
DESIGN: Ten databases were searched for studies comparing the effects of NLFC and conventional processing (CP) for the period January 2008 to September 2017.
STUDY SAMPLE: Twelve articles were included in this review: four adults and school-aged only, one pre-school only and three with both adults and school-aged children.
RESULTS: A two-stage process was implemented to grade the evidence. The individual studies were graded based on their study type (from 1 = highest quality of evidence to 5 = the lowest quality) and then sub-graded based on their quality ("a" for "good quality" or "b" for "lesser quality"). All studies were awarded 4a, except the single pre-school study, which was awarded 2a. The overall evidence for each population was graded based on the quality, quantity and consistency of the studies. The body of evidence was rated as very low for both adults and school-aged children, but high for pre-school children.
CONCLUSION: The low number (and quality) of studies means that evidence supporting the benefit from NLFC is inconclusive. Further high-quality RCTs are required to provide a conclusive answer to this question.
PMID: 29298522 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
The reduction of gunshot noise and auditory risk through the use of firearm suppressors and low-velocity ammunition.
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jan 04;:1-14
Authors: Murphy WJ, Flamme GA, Campbell AR, Zechmann EL, Tasko SM, Lankford JE, Meinke DK, Finan DS, Stewart M
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This research assessed the reduction of peak levels, equivalent energy and sound power of firearm suppressors.
DESIGN: The first study evaluated the effect of three suppressors at four microphone positions around four firearms. The second study assessed the suppressor-related reduction of sound power with a 3 m hemispherical microphone array for two firearms.
RESULTS: The suppressors reduced exposures at the ear between 17 and 24 dB peak sound pressure level and reduced the 8 h equivalent A-weighted energy between 9 and 21 dB depending upon the firearm and ammunition. Noise reductions observed for the instructor's position about a metre behind the shooter were between 20 and 28 dB peak sound pressure level and between 11 and 26 dB LAeq,8h. Firearm suppressors reduced the measured sound power levels between 2 and 23 dB. Sound power reductions were greater for the low-velocity ammunition than for the same firearms fired with high-velocity ammunition due to the effect of N-waves produced by a supersonic bullet.
CONCLUSIONS: Firearm suppressors may reduce noise exposure, and the cumulative exposures of suppressed firearms can still present a significant hearing risk. Therefore, firearm users should always wear hearing protection whenever target shooting or hunting.
PMID: 29299940 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Related Articles |
Is non-linear frequency compression amplification beneficial to adults and children with hearing loss? A systematic review.
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jan 03;:1-12
Authors: Akinseye GA, Dickinson AM, Munro KJ
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the benefits of non-linear frequency compression (NLFC) in adults and children.
DESIGN: Ten databases were searched for studies comparing the effects of NLFC and conventional processing (CP) for the period January 2008 to September 2017.
STUDY SAMPLE: Twelve articles were included in this review: four adults and school-aged only, one pre-school only and three with both adults and school-aged children.
RESULTS: A two-stage process was implemented to grade the evidence. The individual studies were graded based on their study type (from 1 = highest quality of evidence to 5 = the lowest quality) and then sub-graded based on their quality ("a" for "good quality" or "b" for "lesser quality"). All studies were awarded 4a, except the single pre-school study, which was awarded 2a. The overall evidence for each population was graded based on the quality, quantity and consistency of the studies. The body of evidence was rated as very low for both adults and school-aged children, but high for pre-school children.
CONCLUSION: The low number (and quality) of studies means that evidence supporting the benefit from NLFC is inconclusive. Further high-quality RCTs are required to provide a conclusive answer to this question.
PMID: 29298522 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
The reduction of gunshot noise and auditory risk through the use of firearm suppressors and low-velocity ammunition.
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jan 04;:1-14
Authors: Murphy WJ, Flamme GA, Campbell AR, Zechmann EL, Tasko SM, Lankford JE, Meinke DK, Finan DS, Stewart M
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This research assessed the reduction of peak levels, equivalent energy and sound power of firearm suppressors.
DESIGN: The first study evaluated the effect of three suppressors at four microphone positions around four firearms. The second study assessed the suppressor-related reduction of sound power with a 3 m hemispherical microphone array for two firearms.
RESULTS: The suppressors reduced exposures at the ear between 17 and 24 dB peak sound pressure level and reduced the 8 h equivalent A-weighted energy between 9 and 21 dB depending upon the firearm and ammunition. Noise reductions observed for the instructor's position about a metre behind the shooter were between 20 and 28 dB peak sound pressure level and between 11 and 26 dB LAeq,8h. Firearm suppressors reduced the measured sound power levels between 2 and 23 dB. Sound power reductions were greater for the low-velocity ammunition than for the same firearms fired with high-velocity ammunition due to the effect of N-waves produced by a supersonic bullet.
CONCLUSIONS: Firearm suppressors may reduce noise exposure, and the cumulative exposures of suppressed firearms can still present a significant hearing risk. Therefore, firearm users should always wear hearing protection whenever target shooting or hunting.
PMID: 29299940 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Related Articles |
Is non-linear frequency compression amplification beneficial to adults and children with hearing loss? A systematic review.
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jan 03;:1-12
Authors: Akinseye GA, Dickinson AM, Munro KJ
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the benefits of non-linear frequency compression (NLFC) in adults and children.
DESIGN: Ten databases were searched for studies comparing the effects of NLFC and conventional processing (CP) for the period January 2008 to September 2017.
STUDY SAMPLE: Twelve articles were included in this review: four adults and school-aged only, one pre-school only and three with both adults and school-aged children.
RESULTS: A two-stage process was implemented to grade the evidence. The individual studies were graded based on their study type (from 1 = highest quality of evidence to 5 = the lowest quality) and then sub-graded based on their quality ("a" for "good quality" or "b" for "lesser quality"). All studies were awarded 4a, except the single pre-school study, which was awarded 2a. The overall evidence for each population was graded based on the quality, quantity and consistency of the studies. The body of evidence was rated as very low for both adults and school-aged children, but high for pre-school children.
CONCLUSION: The low number (and quality) of studies means that evidence supporting the benefit from NLFC is inconclusive. Further high-quality RCTs are required to provide a conclusive answer to this question.
PMID: 29298522 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]