Correlations Between Patient-Perceived Outcome and Objectively-Measured Biomechanical Change Following Total Knee Replacement

Publication date: Available online 25 February 2019

Source: Gait & Posture

Author(s): P R Biggs, GM Whatling, C Wilson, CA Holt

Abstract

Background

Total Knee Replacement (TKR) surgery is being utilised in a younger, more active population with greater functional expectations. Understanding whether patient-perceived measures of function reflect objective biomechanical measures is critical in understanding whether functional limitations can be adequately captured within a clinical setting.

Research Question

Do changes in objective gait biomechanics measures reflect patient-reported outcome measures at approximately 12 months following TKR surgery?

Methods

Three-dimensional gait analysis was performed on 41 patients with OA who were scheduled for TKR surgery, 22 of which have returned for a (9-24 month) follow-up assessment. Principal Component Analysis was used to define features of variation between OA subjects and an additional 31 non-pathological control subjects. These were used to train the Cardiff Classifier, an objective classification technique, and subsequently quantify changes following TKR surgery. Patient-perceived changes were also assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Outcome Survey (KOS), and Pain Audit Collection System scores (PACS). Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to establish the relationship between changes in objectively-measured and perceived outcome.

Results

Objective measures of biomechanical change were strongly correlated to changes in OKS(r=-.695, p < 0.001) and KOS(r=-.810, p < 0.001) assessed outcomes. Pain (PACS) was only related to biomechanical function post-operatively (r=-.623, p = 0.003).

Significance

In this biomechanics study, the relationship between changes in objective function and patient-reported measures pre to post TKR surgery is stronger than in studies which did not include biomechanics metrics. Quality of movement may hold more significance for a patient’s perception of improvement than functional measures which consider only the time taken or distance travelled during functional activities.

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2Nsw2mA
via IFTTT