Clinical validation of automated audiometry with continuous noise-monitoring in a clinically heterogeneous population outside a sound-treated environment.

Clinical validation of automated audiometry with continuous noise-monitoring in a clinically heterogeneous population outside a sound-treated environment.

Int J Audiol. 2016 May 20;:1-7

Authors: Brennan-Jones CG, Eikelboom RH, Swanepoel W, Friedland PL, Atlas MD

Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Examine the accuracy of automated audiometry in a clinically heterogeneous population of adults using the KUDUwave automated audiometer.
DESIGN: Prospective accuracy study. Manual audiometry was performed in a sound-treated room and automated audiometry was not conducted in a sound-treated environment.
STUDY SAMPLE: 42 consecutively recruited participants from a tertiary otolaryngology department in Western Australia.
RESULTS: Absolute mean differences ranged between 5.12-9.68 dB (air-conduction) and 8.26-15 dB (bone-conduction). A total of 86.5% of manual and automated 4FAs were within 10 dB (i.e. ±5 dB); 94.8% were within 15 dB. However, there were significant (p < 0.05) differences between automated and manual audiometry at 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz (air-conduction) and 500 and 1000 Hz (bone-conduction). The effect of age (≥55 years) on accuracy (p = 0.014) was not significant on linear regression (p > 0.05; R(2) =( ) 0.11). The presence of a hearing loss (better ear ≥26 dB) did not significantly affect accuracy (p = 0.604; air-conduction), (p = 0.218; bone-conduction).
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides clinical validation of automated audiometry using the KUDUwave in a clinically heterogeneous population, without the use of a sound-treated environment. Whilst threshold variations were statistically significant, future research is needed to ascertain the clinical significance of such variation.

PMID: 27206551 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1s2nl6B
via IFTTT