Σάββατο 28 Οκτωβρίου 2017

Influence of Altered Auditory Feedback on Oral-Nasal Balance in Speech.

Related Articles

Influence of Altered Auditory Feedback on Oral-Nasal Balance in Speech.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Oct 26;:1-9

Authors: de Boer G, Bressmann T

Abstract
Purpose: This study explored the role of auditory feedback in the regulation of oral-nasal balance in speech.
Method: Twenty typical female speakers wore a Nasometer 6450 (KayPentax) headset and headphones while continuously repeating a sentence with oral and nasal sounds. Oral-nasal balance was quantified with nasalance scores. The signals from 2 additional oral and nasal microphones were played back to the participants through the headphones. The relative loudness of the nasal channel in the mix was gradually changed so that the speakers heard themselves as more or less nasal. An additional amplitude control group of 9 female speakers completed the same task while hearing themselves louder or softer in the headphones.
Results: A repeated-measures analysis of variance of the mean nasalance scores of the stimulus sentence at baseline, minimum, and maximum nasal feedback conditions demonstrated a significant effect of the nasal feedback condition. Post hoc analyses found that the mean nasalance scores were lowest for the maximum nasal feedback condition. The scores of the minimum nasal feedback condition were significantly higher than 2 of the 3 baseline feedback conditions. The amplitude control group did not show any effects of volume changes on nasalance scores.
Conclusions: Increased nasal feedback led to a compensatory adjustment in the opposite direction, confirming that oral-nasal balance is regulated by auditory feedback. However, a lack of nasal feedback did not lead to a consistent compensatory response of similar magnitude.

PMID: 29075769 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2gQFe8A
via IFTTT

Hearing preservation cochlear implantation in children: The HEARRING Group consensus and practice guide.

Related Articles

Hearing preservation cochlear implantation in children: The HEARRING Group consensus and practice guide.

Cochlear Implants Int. 2017 Oct 26;:1-13

Authors: Rajan G, Tavora-Vieira D, Baumgartner WD, Godey B, Müller J, O'Driscoll M, Skarzynski H, Skarzynski P, Usami SI, Adunka O, Agrawal S, Bruce I, De Bodt M, Caversaccio M, Pilsbury H, Gavilán J, Hagen R, Hagr A, Kameswaran M, Karltorp E, Kompis M, Kuzovkov V, Lassaletta L, Yongxin L, Lorensr A, Manoj M, Martin J, Mertens G, Mlynski R, Parnese L, Pulibalathingal S, Radeloff A, Raine CH, Rajeswaran R, Schmutzhard J, Sprinzl G, Staecker H, Stephan K, Sugarova S, Zernotti M, Zorowka P, Van de Heyning P

Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To provide multidisciplinary cochlear implant teams with a current consensus statement to support hearing preservation cochlear implantation (HPCI) in children, including those children with symptomatic partial deafness (PD) where the intention is to use electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS). The main objectives are to provide guidelines on who is a candidate, how to assess these children and when to implant if Med-El Flex electrode arrays are chosen for implantation.
METHODS: The HEARRING group reviewed the current evidence and practice regarding the management of children to be considered for HPCI surgery emphasizing the assessment needed prior to implantation in order to demonstrate the benefits in these children over time. The consensus statement addresses following three key questions: (1) Should these children be treated? (2) How to identify these children? (3) How to manage these children?
SUMMARY: The HEARRING group concludes that irrespective of the degree of residual hearing present, the concepts of hearing and structure preservation should be applied in every child undergoing cochlear implantation and that HPCI is a safe and reliable treatment option. Early detection and multidisciplinary assessment are key to the identification of children with symptomatic PD, these children should undergo HPCI as early as possible.

PMID: 29073844 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2yYKUUO
via IFTTT

Assessing hearing loss self-management in older adults

.


from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2yTv9MB
via IFTTT

Assessing hearing loss self-management in older adults

.


from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2yTv9MB
via IFTTT

Assessing hearing loss self-management in older adults

.


from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2zMZ1d0
via IFTTT

Assessing hearing loss self-management in older adults

.


from #Audiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2zMZ1d0
via IFTTT

Assessing hearing loss self-management in older adults

.


from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2zMZ1d0
via IFTTT