Horizontal Sound Localization in Cochlear Implant Users with a Contralateral Hearing Aid.

Horizontal Sound Localization in Cochlear Implant Users with a Contralateral Hearing Aid.

Hear Res. 2016 May 10;

Authors: Veugen LC, Hendrikse MM, van Wanrooij MM, Agterberg MJ, Chalupper J, Mens LH, Snik AF, John van Opstal A

Abstract
Interaural differences in sound arrival time (ITD) and in level (ILD) enable us to localize sounds in the horizontal plane, and can support source segregation and speech understanding in noisy environments. It is uncertain whether these cues are also available to hearing-impaired listeners who are bimodally fitted, i.e. with a cochlear implant (CI) and a contralateral hearing aid (HA). Here, we assessed sound localization behavior of fourteen bimodal listeners, all using the same Phonak HA and an Advanced Bionics CI processor, matched with respect to loudness growth. We aimed to determine the availability and contribution of binaural (ILDs, temporal fine structure and envelope ITDs) and monaural (loudness, spectral) cues to horizontal sound localization in bimodal listeners, by systematically varying the frequency band, level and envelope of the stimuli. The sound bandwidth had a strong effect on the localization bias of bimodal listeners, although localization performance was typically poor for all conditions. Responses could be systematically changed by adjusting the frequency range of the stimulus, or by simply switching the HA and CI on and off. Localization responses were largely biased to one side, typically the CI side for broadband and high-pass filtered sounds, and occasionally to the HA side for low-pass filtered sounds.. HA-aided thresholds better than 45 dB HL in the frequency range of the stimulus appeared to be a prerequisite, but not a guarantee, for the ability to indicate sound source direction. We argue that bimodal sound localization is likely based on ILD cues, even at frequencies below 1500 Hz for which the natural ILDs are small. These cues are typically perturbed in bimodal listeners, leading to a biased localization percept of sounds. The high accuracy of some listeners could result from a combination of sufficient spectral overlap and loudness balance in bimodal hearing.

PMID: 27178443 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1V3qfDm
via IFTTT

Horizontal Sound Localization in Cochlear Implant Users with a Contralateral Hearing Aid.

Horizontal Sound Localization in Cochlear Implant Users with a Contralateral Hearing Aid.

Hear Res. 2016 May 10;

Authors: Veugen LC, Hendrikse MM, van Wanrooij MM, Agterberg MJ, Chalupper J, Mens LH, Snik AF, John van Opstal A

Abstract
Interaural differences in sound arrival time (ITD) and in level (ILD) enable us to localize sounds in the horizontal plane, and can support source segregation and speech understanding in noisy environments. It is uncertain whether these cues are also available to hearing-impaired listeners who are bimodally fitted, i.e. with a cochlear implant (CI) and a contralateral hearing aid (HA). Here, we assessed sound localization behavior of fourteen bimodal listeners, all using the same Phonak HA and an Advanced Bionics CI processor, matched with respect to loudness growth. We aimed to determine the availability and contribution of binaural (ILDs, temporal fine structure and envelope ITDs) and monaural (loudness, spectral) cues to horizontal sound localization in bimodal listeners, by systematically varying the frequency band, level and envelope of the stimuli. The sound bandwidth had a strong effect on the localization bias of bimodal listeners, although localization performance was typically poor for all conditions. Responses could be systematically changed by adjusting the frequency range of the stimulus, or by simply switching the HA and CI on and off. Localization responses were largely biased to one side, typically the CI side for broadband and high-pass filtered sounds, and occasionally to the HA side for low-pass filtered sounds.. HA-aided thresholds better than 45 dB HL in the frequency range of the stimulus appeared to be a prerequisite, but not a guarantee, for the ability to indicate sound source direction. We argue that bimodal sound localization is likely based on ILD cues, even at frequencies below 1500 Hz for which the natural ILDs are small. These cues are typically perturbed in bimodal listeners, leading to a biased localization percept of sounds. The high accuracy of some listeners could result from a combination of sufficient spectral overlap and loudness balance in bimodal hearing.

PMID: 27178443 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1V3qfDm
via IFTTT

Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices

10.1080/14992027.2016.1177209<br/>Arjan J. Bosman

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1Tedstc
via IFTTT

Receptive language as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome for prelingually deaf adults

10.3109/14992027.2016.1157269<br/>Alexandra Rousset

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1TOHiUt
via IFTTT

Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices

10.1080/14992027.2016.1177209<br/>Arjan J. Bosman

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1Tedstc
via IFTTT

Receptive language as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome for prelingually deaf adults

10.3109/14992027.2016.1157269<br/>Alexandra Rousset

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1TOHiUt
via IFTTT

Aging effects on the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response in the Mongolian Gerbil: Effects of Interaural Time and Level Differences

Publication date: Available online 10 May 2016
Source:Hearing Research
Author(s): Geneviève Laumen, Daniel J. Tollin, Rainer Beutelmann, Georg M. Klump
The effect of interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD) on wave 4 of the binaural and summed monaural auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) as well as on the DN1 component of the binaural interaction component (BIC) of the ABR in young and old Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) was investigated. Measurements were made at a fixed sound pressure level (SPL) and a fixed level above visually detected ABR threshold to compensate for individual hearing threshold differences. In both stimulation modes (fixed SPL and fixed level above visually detected ABR threshold) an effect of ITD on the latency and the amplitude of wave 4 as well as of the BIC was observed. With increasing absolute ITD values BIC latencies were increased and amplitudes were decreased. ILD had a much smaller effect on these measures. Old animals showed a reduced amplitude of the DN1 component. This difference was due to a smaller wave 4 in the summed monaural ABRs of old animals compared to young animals whereas wave 4 in the binaural-evoked ABR showed no age-related difference. In old animals the small amplitude of the DN1 component was correlated with small binaural-evoked wave 1 and wave 3 amplitudes. This suggests that the reduced peripheral input affects central binaural processing which is reflected in the BIC.



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1WZxjB7
via IFTTT