Can place-specific cochlear dispersion be represented by auditory steady-state responses?

Publication date: Available online 21 February 2016
Source:Hearing Research
Author(s): Andreu Paredes Gallardo, Bastian Epp, Torsten Dau
The present study investigated to what extent properties of local cochlear dispersion can be objectively assessed through auditory steady-state responses (ASSR). The hypothesis was that stimuli compensating for the phase response at a particular cochlear location generate a maximally modulated basilar membrane (BM) response at that BM position, due to the large “within-channel” synchrony of activity. This, in turn, leads to a larger ASSR amplitude than other stimuli of corresponding intensity and bandwidth. Two stimulus types were chosen: 1] Harmonic tone complexes consisting of equal-amplitude tones with a starting phase following an algorithm developed by Schroeder [IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 16, 85-89 (1970)] that have earlier been considered in behavioral studies to estimate human auditory filter phase responses; and 2] simulations of auditory-filter impulse responses (IR). In both cases, also the temporally reversed versions of the stimuli were considered. The ASSRs obtained with the Schroeder tone complexes were found to be dominated by “across-channel” synchrony and, thus, do not reflect local place-specific information. In the case of the more frequency-specific stimuli, no significant differences were found between the responses to the IR and its temporally reversed counterpart. Thus, whereas ASSRs to narrowband stimuli have been used as an objective indicator of frequency-specific hearing sensitivity, the method does not seem to be sensitive enough to reflect local cochlear dispersion.



from #Audiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1Qbe5pj
via IFTTT

Graded and discontinuous EphA-ephrinB expression patterns in the developing auditory brainstem

Publication date: Available online 21 February 2016
Source:Hearing Research
Author(s): Matthew M. Wallace, James A. Harris, Donald Q. Brubaker, Caitlyn A. Klotz, Mark L. Gabriele
Eph-ephrin interactions guide topographic mapping and pattern formation in a variety of systems. In contrast to other sensory pathways, their precise role in the assembly of central auditory circuits remains poorly understood. The auditory midbrain, or inferior colliculus (IC) is an intriguing structure for exploring guidance of patterned projections as adjacent subdivisions exhibit distinct organizational features. The central nucleus of the IC (CNIC) and deep aspects of its neighboring lateral cortex (LCIC, Layer 3) are tonotopically-organized and receive layered inputs from primarily downstream auditory sources. While less is known about more superficial aspects of the LCIC, its inputs are multimodal, lack a clear tonotopic order, and appear discontinuous, terminating in modular, patch/matrix-like distributions. Here we utilize X-Gal staining approaches in lacZ mutant mice (ephrin-B2, -B3, and EphA4) to reveal EphA-ephrinB expression patterns in the nascent IC during the period of projection shaping that precedes hearing onset. We also report early postnatal protein expression in the cochlear nuclei, the superior olivary complex, the nuclei of the lateral lemniscus, and relevant midline structures. Continuous ephrin-B2 and EphA4 expression gradients exist along frequency axes of the CNIC and LCIC Layer 3. In contrast, more superficial LCIC localization is not graded, but confined to a series of discrete ephrin-B2 and EphA4-positive Layer 2 modules. While heavily expressed in the midline, much of the auditory brainstem is devoid of ephrin-B3, including the CNIC, LCIC Layer 2 modular fields, the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (DNLL), as well as much of the superior olivary complex and cochlear nuclei. Ephrin-B3 LCIC expression appears complementary to that of ephrin-B2 and EphA4, with protein most concentrated in presumptive extramodular zones. Described tonotopic gradients and seemingly complementary modular/extramodular patterns suggest Eph-ephrin guidance in establishing juxtaposed continuous and discrete neural maps in the developing IC prior to experience.



from #Audiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1VyL3jG
via IFTTT

Can place-specific cochlear dispersion be represented by auditory steady-state responses?

Publication date: Available online 21 February 2016
Source:Hearing Research
Author(s): Andreu Paredes Gallardo, Bastian Epp, Torsten Dau
The present study investigated to what extent properties of local cochlear dispersion can be objectively assessed through auditory steady-state responses (ASSR). The hypothesis was that stimuli compensating for the phase response at a particular cochlear location generate a maximally modulated basilar membrane (BM) response at that BM position, due to the large “within-channel” synchrony of activity. This, in turn, leads to a larger ASSR amplitude than other stimuli of corresponding intensity and bandwidth. Two stimulus types were chosen: 1] Harmonic tone complexes consisting of equal-amplitude tones with a starting phase following an algorithm developed by Schroeder [IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 16, 85-89 (1970)] that have earlier been considered in behavioral studies to estimate human auditory filter phase responses; and 2] simulations of auditory-filter impulse responses (IR). In both cases, also the temporally reversed versions of the stimuli were considered. The ASSRs obtained with the Schroeder tone complexes were found to be dominated by “across-channel” synchrony and, thus, do not reflect local place-specific information. In the case of the more frequency-specific stimuli, no significant differences were found between the responses to the IR and its temporally reversed counterpart. Thus, whereas ASSRs to narrowband stimuli have been used as an objective indicator of frequency-specific hearing sensitivity, the method does not seem to be sensitive enough to reflect local cochlear dispersion.



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1Qbe5pj
via IFTTT

Graded and discontinuous EphA-ephrinB expression patterns in the developing auditory brainstem

Publication date: Available online 21 February 2016
Source:Hearing Research
Author(s): Matthew M. Wallace, James A. Harris, Donald Q. Brubaker, Caitlyn A. Klotz, Mark L. Gabriele
Eph-ephrin interactions guide topographic mapping and pattern formation in a variety of systems. In contrast to other sensory pathways, their precise role in the assembly of central auditory circuits remains poorly understood. The auditory midbrain, or inferior colliculus (IC) is an intriguing structure for exploring guidance of patterned projections as adjacent subdivisions exhibit distinct organizational features. The central nucleus of the IC (CNIC) and deep aspects of its neighboring lateral cortex (LCIC, Layer 3) are tonotopically-organized and receive layered inputs from primarily downstream auditory sources. While less is known about more superficial aspects of the LCIC, its inputs are multimodal, lack a clear tonotopic order, and appear discontinuous, terminating in modular, patch/matrix-like distributions. Here we utilize X-Gal staining approaches in lacZ mutant mice (ephrin-B2, -B3, and EphA4) to reveal EphA-ephrinB expression patterns in the nascent IC during the period of projection shaping that precedes hearing onset. We also report early postnatal protein expression in the cochlear nuclei, the superior olivary complex, the nuclei of the lateral lemniscus, and relevant midline structures. Continuous ephrin-B2 and EphA4 expression gradients exist along frequency axes of the CNIC and LCIC Layer 3. In contrast, more superficial LCIC localization is not graded, but confined to a series of discrete ephrin-B2 and EphA4-positive Layer 2 modules. While heavily expressed in the midline, much of the auditory brainstem is devoid of ephrin-B3, including the CNIC, LCIC Layer 2 modular fields, the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (DNLL), as well as much of the superior olivary complex and cochlear nuclei. Ephrin-B3 LCIC expression appears complementary to that of ephrin-B2 and EphA4, with protein most concentrated in presumptive extramodular zones. Described tonotopic gradients and seemingly complementary modular/extramodular patterns suggest Eph-ephrin guidance in establishing juxtaposed continuous and discrete neural maps in the developing IC prior to experience.



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1VyL3jG
via IFTTT

Can place-specific cochlear dispersion be represented by auditory steady-state responses?

Publication date: Available online 21 February 2016
Source:Hearing Research
Author(s): Andreu Paredes Gallardo, Bastian Epp, Torsten Dau
The present study investigated to what extent properties of local cochlear dispersion can be objectively assessed through auditory steady-state responses (ASSR). The hypothesis was that stimuli compensating for the phase response at a particular cochlear location generate a maximally modulated basilar membrane (BM) response at that BM position, due to the large “within-channel” synchrony of activity. This, in turn, leads to a larger ASSR amplitude than other stimuli of corresponding intensity and bandwidth. Two stimulus types were chosen: 1] Harmonic tone complexes consisting of equal-amplitude tones with a starting phase following an algorithm developed by Schroeder [IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 16, 85-89 (1970)] that have earlier been considered in behavioral studies to estimate human auditory filter phase responses; and 2] simulations of auditory-filter impulse responses (IR). In both cases, also the temporally reversed versions of the stimuli were considered. The ASSRs obtained with the Schroeder tone complexes were found to be dominated by “across-channel” synchrony and, thus, do not reflect local place-specific information. In the case of the more frequency-specific stimuli, no significant differences were found between the responses to the IR and its temporally reversed counterpart. Thus, whereas ASSRs to narrowband stimuli have been used as an objective indicator of frequency-specific hearing sensitivity, the method does not seem to be sensitive enough to reflect local cochlear dispersion.



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1Qbe5pj
via IFTTT

Graded and discontinuous EphA-ephrinB expression patterns in the developing auditory brainstem

Publication date: Available online 21 February 2016
Source:Hearing Research
Author(s): Matthew M. Wallace, James A. Harris, Donald Q. Brubaker, Caitlyn A. Klotz, Mark L. Gabriele
Eph-ephrin interactions guide topographic mapping and pattern formation in a variety of systems. In contrast to other sensory pathways, their precise role in the assembly of central auditory circuits remains poorly understood. The auditory midbrain, or inferior colliculus (IC) is an intriguing structure for exploring guidance of patterned projections as adjacent subdivisions exhibit distinct organizational features. The central nucleus of the IC (CNIC) and deep aspects of its neighboring lateral cortex (LCIC, Layer 3) are tonotopically-organized and receive layered inputs from primarily downstream auditory sources. While less is known about more superficial aspects of the LCIC, its inputs are multimodal, lack a clear tonotopic order, and appear discontinuous, terminating in modular, patch/matrix-like distributions. Here we utilize X-Gal staining approaches in lacZ mutant mice (ephrin-B2, -B3, and EphA4) to reveal EphA-ephrinB expression patterns in the nascent IC during the period of projection shaping that precedes hearing onset. We also report early postnatal protein expression in the cochlear nuclei, the superior olivary complex, the nuclei of the lateral lemniscus, and relevant midline structures. Continuous ephrin-B2 and EphA4 expression gradients exist along frequency axes of the CNIC and LCIC Layer 3. In contrast, more superficial LCIC localization is not graded, but confined to a series of discrete ephrin-B2 and EphA4-positive Layer 2 modules. While heavily expressed in the midline, much of the auditory brainstem is devoid of ephrin-B3, including the CNIC, LCIC Layer 2 modular fields, the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (DNLL), as well as much of the superior olivary complex and cochlear nuclei. Ephrin-B3 LCIC expression appears complementary to that of ephrin-B2 and EphA4, with protein most concentrated in presumptive extramodular zones. Described tonotopic gradients and seemingly complementary modular/extramodular patterns suggest Eph-ephrin guidance in establishing juxtaposed continuous and discrete neural maps in the developing IC prior to experience.



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1VyL3jG
via IFTTT

Maximizing Outcomes for Children with Auditory Disorders: What are Children Hearing in the Classroom?

Why is assessing auditory functioning important? Hearing is a complex function. It is not safe to assume that a child has normal hearing or normal speech perception. A child may respond to some sounds but not hear other sounds. If they are missing critical information it will interfere with learning. A child needs to be able to understand speech in both quiet and in noise. A child may be fine when it is quiet, but when they are at a distance from the person who is talking or when there is competing noise, this child may have problems.

from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1VytWyj
via IFTTT