Τρίτη 3 Απριλίου 2018

Does hearing in response to soft-tissue stimulation involve skull vibrations? A within-subject comparison between skull vibration magnitudes and hearing thresholds

S03785955.gif

Publication date: Available online 3 April 2018
Source:Hearing Research
Author(s): Shai Chordekar, Ronen Perez, Cahtia Adelman, Haim Sohmer, Liat Kishon-Rabin
Hearing can be elicited in response to bone as well as soft-tissue stimulation. However, the underlying mechanism of soft-tissue stimulation is under debate. It has been hypothesized that if skull vibrations were the underlying mechanism of hearing in response to soft-tissue stimulation, then skull vibrations would be associated with hearing thresholds. However, if skull vibrations were not associated with hearing thresholds, an alternative mechanism is involved. In the present study, both skull vibrations and hearing thresholds were assessed in the same participants in response to bone (mastoid) and soft-tissue (neck) stimulation. The experimental group included five hearing-impaired adults in whom a bone-anchored hearing aid was implanted due to conductive or mixed hearing loss. Because the implant is exposed above the skin and has become an integral part of the temporal bone, vibration of the implant represented skull vibrations. To ensure that middle-ear pathologies of the experimental group did not affect overall results, hearing thresholds were also obtained in 10 participants with normal hearing in response to stimulation at the same sites. We found that the magnitude of the bone vibrations initiated by the stimulation at the two sites (neck and mastoid) detected by the laser Doppler vibrometer on the bone-anchored implant were linearly related to stimulus intensity. It was therefore possible to extrapolate the vibration magnitudes at low-intensity stimulation, where poor signal-to-noise ratio limited actual recordings. It was found that the vibration magnitude differences (between soft-tissue and bone stimulation) were not different then the hearing threshold differences at the tested frequencies. Results of the present study suggest that bone vibration magnitude differences can adequately explain hearing threshold differences and are likely to be responsible for the hearing sensation. Thus, the present results support the idea that bone and soft-tissue conduction could share the same underlying mechanism, namely the induction of bone vibrations. Studies with the present methodology should be continued in future work in order to obtain further insight into the underlying mechanism of activation of the hearing system.



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2GTzrKA
via IFTTT

Vestibular and balance function is often impaired in children with profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss

S03785955.gif

Publication date: Available online 3 April 2018
Source:Hearing Research
Author(s): Meirav Sokolov, Karen A. Gordon, Melissa Polonenko, Susan I. Blaser, Blake C. Papsin, Sharon L. Cushing
RationaleChildren with unilateral deafness could have concurrent vestibular dysfunction which would be associated with balance deficits and potentially impair overall development. The prevalence of vestibular and balance deficits remains to be defined in these children.MethodsTwenty children with unilateral deafness underwent comprehensive vestibular and balance evaluation.ResultsRetrospective review revealed that more than half of the cohort demonstrated some abnormality of the vestibular end organs (otoliths and horizontal canal), with the prevalence of end organ specific dysfunction ranging from 17 to 48% depending on organ tested and method used. In most children, impairment occurred only on the deaf side. Children with unilateral deafness also displayed significantly poorer balance function than their normal hearing peers.ConclusionsThe prevalence of vestibular dysfunction in children with unilateral deafness is high and similar to that of children with bilateral deafness. Vestibular and balance evaluation should be routine and the functional impact of combined vestibulo-cochlear sensory deficits considered.



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2IoDBHe
via IFTTT

Hearing loss in older adults - From epidemiological insights to national initiatives

S03785955.gif

Publication date: Available online 3 April 2018
Source:Hearing Research
Author(s): Adele M. Goman, Frank R. Lin
The broader implications of hearing loss for the health and functioning of older adults have begun to be demonstrated in epidemiologic studies. These research findings on the association between hearing loss and poorer health outcomes have formed the foundation for national initiatives on hearing loss and public health. These national initiatives range from the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE) clinical trial to the recent passage of the bipartisan Over-The-Counter Hearing Aid Act. Utilizing population health research methodologies to study hearing loss can provide the foundation for initiating top-down approaches to increase the adoption and accessibility of hearing care for older Americans with hearing loss.



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2GQwtpR
via IFTTT

Does hearing in response to soft-tissue stimulation involve skull vibrations? A within-subject comparison between skull vibration magnitudes and hearing thresholds

S03785955.gif

Publication date: Available online 3 April 2018
Source:Hearing Research
Author(s): Shai Chordekar, Ronen Perez, Cahtia Adelman, Haim Sohmer, Liat Kishon-Rabin
Hearing can be elicited in response to bone as well as soft-tissue stimulation. However, the underlying mechanism of soft-tissue stimulation is under debate. It has been hypothesized that if skull vibrations were the underlying mechanism of hearing in response to soft-tissue stimulation, then skull vibrations would be associated with hearing thresholds. However, if skull vibrations were not associated with hearing thresholds, an alternative mechanism is involved. In the present study, both skull vibrations and hearing thresholds were assessed in the same participants in response to bone (mastoid) and soft-tissue (neck) stimulation. The experimental group included five hearing-impaired adults in whom a bone-anchored hearing aid was implanted due to conductive or mixed hearing loss. Because the implant is exposed above the skin and has become an integral part of the temporal bone, vibration of the implant represented skull vibrations. To ensure that middle-ear pathologies of the experimental group did not affect overall results, hearing thresholds were also obtained in 10 participants with normal hearing in response to stimulation at the same sites. We found that the magnitude of the bone vibrations initiated by the stimulation at the two sites (neck and mastoid) detected by the laser Doppler vibrometer on the bone-anchored implant were linearly related to stimulus intensity. It was therefore possible to extrapolate the vibration magnitudes at low-intensity stimulation, where poor signal-to-noise ratio limited actual recordings. It was found that the vibration magnitude differences (between soft-tissue and bone stimulation) were not different then the hearing threshold differences at the tested frequencies. Results of the present study suggest that bone vibration magnitude differences can adequately explain hearing threshold differences and are likely to be responsible for the hearing sensation. Thus, the present results support the idea that bone and soft-tissue conduction could share the same underlying mechanism, namely the induction of bone vibrations. Studies with the present methodology should be continued in future work in order to obtain further insight into the underlying mechanism of activation of the hearing system.



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2GTzrKA
via IFTTT

Vestibular and balance function is often impaired in children with profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss

S03785955.gif

Publication date: Available online 3 April 2018
Source:Hearing Research
Author(s): Meirav Sokolov, Karen A. Gordon, Melissa Polonenko, Susan I. Blaser, Blake C. Papsin, Sharon L. Cushing
RationaleChildren with unilateral deafness could have concurrent vestibular dysfunction which would be associated with balance deficits and potentially impair overall development. The prevalence of vestibular and balance deficits remains to be defined in these children.MethodsTwenty children with unilateral deafness underwent comprehensive vestibular and balance evaluation.ResultsRetrospective review revealed that more than half of the cohort demonstrated some abnormality of the vestibular end organs (otoliths and horizontal canal), with the prevalence of end organ specific dysfunction ranging from 17 to 48% depending on organ tested and method used. In most children, impairment occurred only on the deaf side. Children with unilateral deafness also displayed significantly poorer balance function than their normal hearing peers.ConclusionsThe prevalence of vestibular dysfunction in children with unilateral deafness is high and similar to that of children with bilateral deafness. Vestibular and balance evaluation should be routine and the functional impact of combined vestibulo-cochlear sensory deficits considered.



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2IoDBHe
via IFTTT

Hearing loss in older adults - From epidemiological insights to national initiatives

S03785955.gif

Publication date: Available online 3 April 2018
Source:Hearing Research
Author(s): Adele M. Goman, Frank R. Lin
The broader implications of hearing loss for the health and functioning of older adults have begun to be demonstrated in epidemiologic studies. These research findings on the association between hearing loss and poorer health outcomes have formed the foundation for national initiatives on hearing loss and public health. These national initiatives range from the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE) clinical trial to the recent passage of the bipartisan Over-The-Counter Hearing Aid Act. Utilizing population health research methodologies to study hearing loss can provide the foundation for initiating top-down approaches to increase the adoption and accessibility of hearing care for older Americans with hearing loss.



from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2GQwtpR
via IFTTT

Focus on People Awards Opens for Nominations

Oticon, Inc. is seeking nominations of outstanding individuals with any degree of hearing loss for the 2018 Oticon Focus on People Awards.  For 20 years, the Oticon Focus on People Awards have set the gold standard for recognizing the achievements and contributions of people with hearing loss.  Established in 1997, the national awards program honors students, adults, advocacy volunteers and hearing care professionals who show that hearing loss does not limit a person's ability to make a positive difference. 

FOP_20th.jpg"For more than 20 years, the Oticon Focus on People Awards has created the kind of awareness that changes attitudes and opens doors of opportunity for all people with hearing loss," said Nancy Palmere, Director of Consumer Marketing and Public Relations for Oticon, Inc., who heads the national program.  "Our approach is simple. By drawing national attention to everyday people doing amazing things, who also happened to have hearing loss, we aim to change negative perceptions of hearing loss and encourage those reluctant to address their own hearing health to seek professional care."

Easy to Nominate

Anyone may nominate.  Quick and easy nominations forms, available at www.Oticon.com/FOP, can be downloaded or completed online. People with all degrees of hearing loss – from mild to more severe - are eligible. There is also a special category for hearing care practitioners with or without hearing loss. Deadline for nominations is May 18, 2018.

Four Categories with Three Winners in Each

Categories include: Student, for full-time students with hearing loss, ages 6 – 25; Adult, for people with hearing loss, ages 21 and above; and Advocacy, for volunteers with hearing loss, who are actively involved in support efforts for the hard-of-hearing and deaf community. A special Practitioner category recognizes hearing care professionals who go "above and beyond" through humanitarian and public education efforts. Nominees in the Practitioner category are not required to have a hearing loss to qualify.

First place winners receive a $1,000 cash prize and a $1,000 donation to the charity of their choice.  First place winners in the Student, Adult and Advocacy categories also receive Oticon BrainHearing™ hearing devices.  Second place winners receive a $500 cash prize and third place winners, a $250 cash prize.

Following the close of nominations, the general public will be invited to vote online to determine first, second and third place winners in each category. 

Published: 4/3/2018 12:12:00 PM


from #Audiology via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2H5RPNI
via IFTTT